首页|马尾松林叶面积指数季节动态的测定

马尾松林叶面积指数季节动态的测定

扫码查看
[目的]评价光学仪器法测定马尾松林叶面积指数(LAI)的精度,为准确监测马尾松林LAI季节动态提供技术支持。[方法]以凋落物法测定值代表马尾松林真实的LAI,对展叶调查、异速生长方程法和光学仪器法(半球摄影法和LAI-2200 植物冠层分析仪)获取的马尾松林LAI季节动态进行评估,并量化不同因素包括集聚指数(ΩE)、木质比例(α)和针簇比(γE)对光学仪器测定值的影响。[结果]马尾松林内主要树种的平均叶寿命为 1。53~1。94,比叶面积(SLA)差异较大(99。15~278。33 cm2/g)。不同方法测定马尾松林LAI的季节动态均呈单峰形变化模式,且在 7 月达到峰值。在各调查时期,凋落物法的测定值与异速生长方程法的测定值差异不显著。半球摄影法测定的有效叶面积指数(Le)比凋落物法、异速生长方程法的测定值分别低估了49%~64%和 47%~61%;LAI-2200 植物冠层分析仪法测定的Le低估了 25%~44%和 20%~42%。半球摄影法测定的Le经自动曝光、α、ΩE及γE校正后,精度明显提高,比凋落物法、异速生长方程法平均低估了8%和 5%;LAI-2200 植物冠层分析仪法测定的Le经α、ΩE及γE校正后,其精度大幅度提高,比凋落物法、异速生长方程法平均低估了 6%和 2%。[结论]考虑影响光学仪器法测定LAI的因素后,半球摄影法和LAI-2200 植物冠层分析仪法测定的LAI精度得到明显提高,表明两种光学仪器法均能相对准确地测定马尾松林LAI的季节动态,可为不同区域马尾松林LAI季节动态的研究提供方法参考。
Determination of seasonal dynamics of leaf area index in the Pinus massoniana forest
[Objective]Evaluate the accuracy of the leaf area index(LAI)of Pinus massoniana by optical instrumentation to provide technical support for accurately monitoring the LAI seasonal dynamics of P.massoniana forest.[Method]We evaluated the seasonal dynamics of LAI estimated by leaf-spreading surveys,the anisotropic growth equation method,the apomictic method,and optical instrumental methods(hemispherical photography and the LAI-2200 plant canopy analyser)in the P.massoniana forest by using the apomictic method measured values as representative of the true LAI values of P.massoniana forest,and we considered the sources of error of the LAI determined by the optical instrumental methods(clumping index(ΩE),woody-to-total area ratio(α),and needle-cluster ratio(γE)).[Result]The mean leaf lifespan of the major species within the P.massoniana forest ranged from 1.53 to 1.94,and SLA varied widely(99.15 cm2/g-278.33 cm2/g).The seasonal dynamics of LAI in P.massoniana forests determined by different methods showed a single-peak change pattern,and reached a peak in July.In each period,there was no significant difference between the value determined by litterfall method and allometry method.During the entire investigation period,the effective leaf area index(Le)measured by DHP was underestimated by 49%-64%and 47%-61%,respectively,compared with the values measured by litterfall method and allometry method.Le measured by LAI-2200 underestimates 25%-44%and 20%-42%,respectively.The accuracy of Le measured by DHP was obviously improved after corrected by automatic exposure,α,ΩE and γE.Compared with litterfall method and allometry method,the accuracy was average underestimated by 8%and 5%.Generally speaking,after corrected by α,ΩE and γE,the accuracy of LAI-2200 was greatly improved,compared with litterfall method and allometry method,it was underestimated by an average of 6%and 2%,respectively.[Conclusion]After considering the factors that affect the determination of LAI by optical instrument method,the accuracy of LAI measured by DHP and LAI-2200 methods had been significantly improved,indicating that both optical instrument methods can accurately determine the seasonal dynamics of LAI in P.massoniana forest and can provide a methodological reference for the study of seasonal dynamics of LAI in P.massoniana forests in different regions.

Pinus massoniana plantationleaf area indexseasonal dynamicslitter collectiondigital hemispherical photographyLAI-2200 plant canopy analyzer method

冉佳璇、罗光浪、何世强、丁贵杰、谭伟、戚玉娇

展开 >

贵州大学 林学院,贵州 贵阳 550025

贵州奇点森林勘察设计有限公司,贵州 安顺 561000

贵州省林业科学研究院,贵州 贵阳 550005

贵州大学 贵州省森林资源与环境研究中心,贵州 贵阳 550025

展开 >

马尾松人工林 叶面积指数 季节动态 凋落物法 半球摄影法 LAI-2200植物冠层分析仪

国家重点研发计划项目贵州省科技计划项目贵州省一流学科建设项目

2017YFD0600302黔科合支撑[2019]2874GNYL[2017]007

2024

中南林业科技大学学报
中南林业科技大学

中南林业科技大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.442
ISSN:1673-923X
年,卷(期):2024.44(5)