"信息隐私鸿沟"的伦理风险及应对
Ethical Risks and Countermeasures of Informational Privacy Gap
王娟 1秦庆2
作者信息
- 1. 巢湖学院文学与传媒学院,合肥 238002;中国科学院科学传播研究中心,合肥 230026
- 2. 中国科学院科学传播研究中心,合肥 230026;中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院,合肥 230026
- 折叠
摘要
认识论范式下,"信息隐私鸿沟"指他者对个体的隐私认知增强引发的个体在信息隐私享有上"应然"与"实然"之间的差距.新兴科技"入侵式"的发展导致"信息隐私鸿沟"现象愈发明显,其可能引发的伦理风险有鸿沟异化破坏个体完整性、鸿沟极化加速社会分层、鸿沟"钙化"生成新式霸权、鸿沟积化引发生存危机.鉴于"信息隐私鸿沟"本质上是一种信任鸿沟,可以从伦理、技术、法律等方面着力,构建多重默认信任区域予以应对.
Abstract
Informational Privacy Gap(IPG)refers to the gap between"what it should be"and"what it really is"as for individuals having informational pri-vacy,caused by the cognitive enhancement of knowing about one's privacy from the perspective of the epistemological paradigm.As new technologies evolve in an"invasive"way,IPG draws more attention,which may lead to ethical risks,such as gap alienation destroying individual integrity,gap polarization ac-celerating social stratification,gap"calcification"generating new hegemony,gap accumulation causing existential crisis.We suggest that we construct multi-ple default trust zones from the aspects of ethical,technological and lawful paths to tackle these problems since IPG can be regarded as a trust gap.
关键词
信息隐私/信息隐私鸿沟/默认信任区域Key words
informational privacy/informational privacy gap/default trust zone引用本文复制引用
基金项目
2023年安徽省人文社科重点项目(2023AH052076)
巢湖学院科研启动项目(KYQD-202213)
2022年江苏省"双创博士"项目(JSSCBS20221113)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据