首页|基于"史哲兼修"的"大写的和小写的"科学革命关系究竟如何?——兼与肖显静教授商榷

基于"史哲兼修"的"大写的和小写的"科学革命关系究竟如何?——兼与肖显静教授商榷

扫码查看
肖显静教授的近著是一部"史哲兼修"的学术大作.只有在合理地理解科学史与科学哲学之间的关系后,才能正确地评价其研究的合法性和学术贡献.从麦克马林提供的概念资源出发,肖著可以被理解为一种"外在科学哲学".这一研究进路所依赖的理论概念,即"大写的科学革命"与"小写的科学革命"及其之间的关系,存在着值得商榷和修补的地方.
From Combining History and Philosophy of Science to the Great and Small Scientific Revolutions:And a Discussion with Prof.Xiao Xianjing
Prof.Xiao Xianjing's recent work is an ambitious attempt to combine history and philosophy of science.Only when we arrive at a rational un-derstanding on the relationship between history of science and philosophy of science,can we appropriately appreciate its academic legitimacy and contribu-tion.Using the conceptual resources of Eman McMullin,we can take Prof.Xiao's work as a version of"external philosophy of science".Besides,the basic concepts of this approach,particularly"the uppercase Scientific Revolution","the lowercase Scientific Revolution"and their relationship,need to be clarified or modified in order to avoid ambiguity.

history and philosophy of sciencethe Scientific Revolutioninternal philosophy of scienceexternal philosophy of science

黄翔

展开 >

复旦大学哲学学院,上海 200433

科学史和科学哲学 科学革命 内在科学哲学 外在科学哲学

国家社会科学基金教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重大项目

18BZX04122JHQ003

2024

自然辩证法研究
中国自然辩证法研究会

自然辩证法研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.395
ISSN:1000-8934
年,卷(期):2024.40(7)