自然辩证法研究2024,Vol.40Issue(12) :55-61.

知识论探究性转向与反复检验

The Zetetic Turn in Epistemology and Incessant Checking

叶佳予
自然辩证法研究2024,Vol.40Issue(12) :55-61.

知识论探究性转向与反复检验

The Zetetic Turn in Epistemology and Incessant Checking

叶佳予1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 华东师范大学哲学系,上海 200241
  • 折叠

摘要

当代知识论中出现了名为"探究性转向"的新观点,主张以探究性理论取代传统的知识论研究范式.弗里德曼认为反复检验行为的认知不合理性在于探究行为中存在不合理的信念态度,此方案尽管相比主流观念具有优点,但难以成立并且有悖于探究性转向的自身观点.反复检验需要一种更加符合探究性转向逻辑的解释方案,这类行为的不合理性并不在于检验主体在探究过程中"相信"或"暂停判断"的态度违背认知规范,而是在于主体缺失了对检验行为的合理反思.

Abstract

In contemporary epistemology,some scholars put forward a new perspective called"the zetetic turn".Friedman argues that the epistemic irra-tionality of incessant checking lies in the presence of irrational doxastic attitudes in the inquiry process.Although this solution has advantages over the ma-instream view,it is difficult to establish and contrary to the zetetic turn's own viewpoint.Finally,this paper proposes a better explanation of incessant checking than Friedman's view,argues that the irrationality lies in the subject's lack of rational reflection on the act of checking.

关键词

探究/反复检验/探究性转向/认知规范

Key words

inquiry/incessant checking/zetetic turn/epistemic norms

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
自然辩证法研究
中国自然辩证法研究会

自然辩证法研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.395
ISSN:1000-8934
段落导航相关论文