首页|政府干预、非农就业对农地转出户福利不平等的影响

政府干预、非农就业对农地转出户福利不平等的影响

扫码查看
原文链接
  • NETL
  • NSTL
  • 万方数据
政府干预和非农就业会对农地转出户福利不平等产生重要影响。基于山西553户农地转出户调研数据，测度政府干预农地流转下农地转出户福利水平，分析不同政府干预类型下农地转出户的福利不平等，采用Kakwani指数、Ⅳ法和分位数回归分析政府干预类型及农户非农就业对农地转出户福利不平等的影响。研究发现:农地转出户总体福利有所改善，但健康、社保和环境福利有所下降;政府主导型农地转出户福利不平等的增幅大于政府服务型;政府主导型农地流转扩大农地转出户福利不平等，非农就业缓解农地转出户福利不平等，非农就业在政府干预类型与农地转出户福利不平等之间有负向调节效应;政府主导型农地流转扩大福利差距较大的农地转出户的福利不平等，非农就业缓解福利差距较小的农地转出户的福利不平等。政府干预农地流转应构建农地转出户福利水平与福利不平等的监测和预警机制，谨慎推进政府主导型农地流转，合理运用非农就业的调节作用，加强福利差距较大的农地转出户的福利保障。
The effect of government intervention and non-agricultural employment on welfare inequality of the peasant households having transferred out farmland
Government intervention and non-agricultural employment would have an important impact on the welfare inequality of peasant households having transferred out farmland.Based on the survey data of the 553 peasant households having transferred out farmland in Shanxi,the welfare levels of these households under government-intervened farmland transfer were measured,and their welfare inequality having transferred out farmland of different types of government intervention was compared and analyzed.The method of Kakwani index,Ⅳapproach and Quantile Regression Model were adopted in analyzing the influence of different types of government intervention and non-agricultural employment on the welfare inequality of peasant households having transferred out farmland.The results show that the overall welfare of the peasant households having transferred out farmland was slightly improved under the government-intervened farmland transfer,but the welfare of health,social security and environmental declined.The increase of welfare inequality of such households under government-dominated farmland transfer was greater than that of the peasant households under government-serviced farmland transfer.The government-dominated farmland transfer significantly expanded the welfare inequality of the peasant households having transferred out farmland,while non-agricultural employment significantly alleviated this phenomenon,and non-agricultural employment had a negative moderating effect on the relationship between government intervention types and welfare inequality of the peasant households having transferred out farmland.The government-dominated farmland transfer expanded the welfare inequality of peasant households having transferred out farmland who previously had a large welfare gap with others,and the non-agricultural employment alleviated the welfare inequality of peasant households having transferred out farmland who previously had a narrow welfare gap with others.When the government intervenes in the farmland transfer,it should establish a monitor system and a early warning mechanism of the welfare levels and welfare inequality of peasant households having transferred out farmland,prudently promote the government-dominated farmland transfer,rationally utilizing the regulating role of non-agricultural employment,and strengthening the welfare security of peasant households having transferred out farmland who had a large welfare gap with others.

government interventionnon-agricultural employmentwelfare inequalitygovernment-dominatedgovernment-servicedTaihang-Lvliang Mountain Area

张振宇、范颖、尤亮

展开 >

山西农业大学农业经济管理学院,太原 030006

山西财经大学平台经济研究院,太原 030006

政府干预 非农就业 福利不平等 政府主导 政府服务 太行—吕梁山区

国家自然科学基金山西省哲学社会科学规划项目山西农业大学博士科研启动基金

719031172022YY0402021ZBQ07

2024

10.31497/zrzyxb.20240509

自然资源学报
中国自然资源学会 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所

自然资源学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子：2.073
ISSN：1000-3037
年,卷(期)：2024.39(5)