摘要
秉持著作权法只保护"自然人的创作"的观点,人工智能大模型无法成为著作权法上的作者.基于既有的作品构成要件规则、创作方式转型背景和美术作品"思想/表达二分法"原则等维度进行判断,体现人的独创性智力投入的"AI文生图"属于美术作品,其著作权归属于利用人工智能生成图片的人."AI文生图"著作权案的司法裁判充分考量了双方当事人之间的利益、双方所在群体的利益、立法者的价值选择和社会公共利益等因素.
Abstract
Based on the view that copyright law only protects the creation of natural persons,AI models cannot be authors under the copyright law.Considering the existing rules on the constituent elements of works,the background of the transformation of creation methods,and the principle of"idea-expression dichotomy"on artistic works,"AI text-to-image"made by the original intellectual input of human beings shall be categorized as the work of art,and its copyright belongs to the person who generates images by using AI.The judicial adjudication of this"AI text-to-image"copyright case fully considered the interests of both parties,the interests of their communities,the legislator's highlight of values,and the public interest of society.
万方数据