首页|专利非实施主体的价值评判与法律规制——以网络化开放创新范式为视角

专利非实施主体的价值评判与法律规制——以网络化开放创新范式为视角

扫码查看
在传统视角下,专利非实施主体(NPE)主要产生于知识产权制度的漏洞,它们通过滥诉和滥用禁令救济等方式攫取了不合理的高额利润,会产生阻碍创新、损害消费者利益、破坏市场秩序等消极效果.但实际上,NPE的产生与网络化开放创新密切相关.NPE是知识产权二级市场发展和专业化分工的产物,它在许可谈判中的优势地位很大程度上来自于专利许可模式由事前许可向事后许可的转变.同时,NPE也反过来促进了网络化开放创新.它可以促进技术流动,降低企业获取技术的搜寻成本,提高小企业和个体发明人的创新激励.因此,NPE并没有"原罪",而是一个中性的市场主体.对NPE的规制思路,应当从基于主体身份的规制路径转变为基于滥用行为及其权利源头的规制路径.
From the traditional perspective,patent non-practicing entities(NPEs)are mainly caused by loopholes in the intellectual property system.They grab unreasonably high profits through excessive litigations and abuse of injunctive reliefs,which will have negative effects such as hindering innovation,damaging consumers'interests and destroying market order.But in fact,the emergence of NPEs is closely related to networked open innovation.NPEs are the products of the development of the secondary market of intellectual property rights and the specialized division of labor.Their dominant position in licensing negotiation largely comes from the change of patent licensing mode from ex ante transactions to ex post transactions.At the same time,NPEs in turn promote networked open innovation.They can promote the flow of technologies,reduce the search costs for enterprises to acquire technologies,and improve the innovation incentive of small enterprises and individual inventors.Therefore,NPEs have no"original sin",but neutral market subjects.The regulatory approach to NPEs should shift from regulating based on the subject itself to regulating based on abusive behaviors and the source of rights.

networked open innovationnon-practicing entitypatent assertion entitystandard essential patentinjunction

宁立志、龚涛

展开 >

武汉大学法学院

网络化开放创新 非实施主体 专利主张实体 标准必要专利 禁令

国家社会科学基金重大项目

21&ZD141

2024

知识产权
中国知识产权研究会

知识产权

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.115
ISSN:1003-0476
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 83