The coexistence of the two doctrines of publicity(registration)confrontationism and pub-licity effectivism in the same legal system is an unreasonable legislative approach.This is because from the perspective of legislative theory,it is quite difficult to propose matching criteria for different doctrines of change of property right.From the perspective of interpretative theory,it is also difficult to solve the system dilemma and logical conflict,and the movable property mortgage system and Article 414 of the Civil Code highlight this dilemma.On these two modes of property changes,each one has its own advan-tages and disadvantages.But if the registration system and the registration agency's management costs are taken into account,giving up the registration of confrontationism should be the optimal choice.The abolition of registration confrontationism should be achieved by the interpretative theory.Adopting a cat-egorized approach,the registration of motor vehicles should be interpreted as an administrative measure;the registration of movable property should not be interpreted as registration confrontationism,but as an exceptional safeguard mechanism for the delivery of movable property;once immovable property has been registered,the application of article 385 of the Civil Code should be expanded to take registration in-to effect;and for unregistered immovable property,the consequences of loss of rights under articles 577 and 154 should be excluded as a counter-incentive.
Registration Confrontation DoctrineRegistration Effectivism DoctrineCivil CodeRegistriesInterpretive Theory
万方数据
