首页|如何展开刑诉法的第四次修改?基于立法历程观察的思考

如何展开刑诉法的第四次修改?基于立法历程观察的思考

扫码查看
改革开放以来,中国刑事诉讼法经历了一次"初立"和三次"修改".自1979年《刑事诉讼法》实现从"0"到"1"的突破后,数次修改均是从"1"到"1.1""1.2"……的渐变过程.观察立法历程,我国刑事诉讼立法改革因循一种渐进、适度的修改逻辑,始终强调国家的主导作用,但也注重社会参与和改革共识的达成.这种改革趋势或许将持续——过去怎么改,也将大概率地影响现在和将来怎么改.在整体改革步伐趋稳的背景下,第四次刑事诉讼法修改不可能是一次"大改",且与大改相应的法典化也难在此次修改中实现,但与数字诉讼法、涉外刑事诉讼程序以及其他已经达成共识或积累有益经验的改革可能会列入修改内容.在中国式刑事诉讼现代化背景下,此次修改将会是顺应数字时代和全球竞合,体现国家需要,并基于科学、民主的"小改"或"微改".
Since the reform and opening-up,China's criminal procedure law has undergone an initial establishment in 1979 and three subsequent revisions.After the breakthrough from"0"to"1"in 1979,each amendment has been a gradual process from"1"to"1.1","1.2",and so on.The legislative history reveals that China's criminal procedure reforms follow a logic of gradual,moderate adjustment,emphasi-zing state leadership while also considering social participation and consensus.This trend suggests that past changes will likely influence current and future reforms.In the context of a stable overall reform pace,the fourth amendment to the criminal procedure law is unlikely to be a major overhaul or involve codification.However,it may address digital litigation laws,international criminal procedures,and oth-er areas where consensus has been reached or beneficial experiences have been accumulated.In the con-text of modernizing criminal procedure with Chinese characteristics,this amendment is expected to align with the digital age and global competition,reflecting national needs through scientific and democratic"small"or"minor"adjustments.Thus,China's criminal procedure legislation will continue to exhibit high creativity and strong vitality.

Criminal Procedure LawFourth RevisionLegislative ReformCodification

左卫民

展开 >

四川大学法学院

刑事诉讼法 第四次修改 立法改革 法典化

2024

中外法学
北京大学

中外法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.903
ISSN:1002-4875
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)