首页|刑事诉讼法的解法典化与再法典化

刑事诉讼法的解法典化与再法典化

扫码查看
法典化以某一领域缺乏统一法典为前提,"刑事诉讼法的法典化"的说法在逻辑上并不成立.然而,法典化旨在解决的分散立法问题,在刑事诉讼领域同样存在.公安司法机关各自出台的司法解释将《刑事诉讼法》解构并架空,造成了明显的解法典化现象,引发了法律权威减损、法律稳定破坏、法律价值扭曲、法律体系动摇等严重弊病.为终结"以规代法"的局面,恢复法权威性、维护法安定性、重塑法统一性、强化法自主性,就需要对既有规范体系展开再法典化操作.在《刑事诉讼法》第四次修改的背景下,以再法典化为导向,重新审视刑事诉讼领域内的全部规范,通过适当的模式与技术,取精用宏、去芜存菁,继而将其完整、和谐地汇编为一部新的法典,是法典化时代应当完成的历史重任.
The codification presupposes the absence of a unified codein a given field,making the no-tion of"codification of the Criminal Procedure Law"logically untenable.That being said,the issue of o-verly fragmented legislation,which codification aims to resolve,also exists in the field of criminal proce-dure.Judicial interpretation documents issued independently by public security and judicial organs have fragmented and hollowed out the Criminal Procedure Law,leading to a noticeable phenomenon of decodi-fication.This has caused serious issues such as diminution of legal authority,erosion of legal stability,distortion of legal values,and weakening of the legal system.To address the situation of"regulations substituting for law",restore the authority of law,maintain legal stability,reestablish legal unity,and enhance legal autonomy,a recodification of the existing normative system is necessary.Against the back-drop of the fourth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law,it is essential to re-evaluate all existing regulations in the field of criminal procedure.Through appropriate models and techniques,one should re-fine and consolidate these regulations,and then compile them into a new,complete,and harmonious code.This task is a historical responsibility to be fulfilled in the era of codification.

Criminal Procedure LawDecodificationRecodificationJudicial Interpretation

聂友伦

展开 >

华东师范大学法学院

刑事诉讼法 解法典化 再法典化 司法解释

教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目2023年中央政法委委托课题

23YJC8200592023K20463

2024

中外法学
北京大学

中外法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.903
ISSN:1002-4875
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)