首页|强奸迷思的证据法反思

强奸迷思的证据法反思

扫码查看
强奸迷思是对强奸行为或被害人通常行为反应所形成的错误或片面的看法,在我国刑事司法实务中亦普遍存在.强奸迷思在事实推论过程中发挥了"概括"的作用,在很大程度上影响了强奸案件能否获得追诉和定罪.对概括正当性的审查应当结合事实和价值两个层面的判断.在刑事司法制度中反对强奸迷思适用的主要理由是:就事实层面而言,现实世界中的强奸行为和被害人的行为反应具有多样性,认为强奸行为及被害人的反应仅存在一种典型模式的观点是错误的.就价值层面而言,强奸迷思的生成和传播是传统社会父权制权力结构的产物,体现了性别不平等的价值.在证据法领域对强奸迷思进行规制,不宜采取证据排除规则的规制方法,而适宜采用推论限制规则和概括解释规则的形式,谨慎地界定所禁止推论的范围,以防止过度损害证据的证明价值.
Rape myths refer to erroneous or partial views about rape behaviors or victim responses,which are prevalent in China's criminal justice practice.These myths often play a"generalization"role in factual inference processes,significantly affecting whether rape cases are prosecuted and convicted.In e-valuating the legitimacy of generalizations,both factual and value judgments are necessary.Factually,rape behaviors and victim responses are diverse in the real world,and the notion that there is a single typ-ical pattern is incorrect.From a value perspective,rape myths stem from traditional patriarchal power structures,reflecting gender inequality.In evidence law,addressing rape myths should not rely on exclu-sionary rules,which might excessively undermine the evidential value.Instead,inference limitation rules and generalization interpretation rules should be used to carefully define the scope of prohibited infer-ences,ensuring that the probative value of evidence is not unduly compromised.

Rape MythsGeneralizationFactual DeterminationGender Equality

向燕

展开 >

西南政法大学刑事检察研究中心

强奸迷思 概括 事实认定 性别平等

2020年度国家社科基金项目

20BFX098

2024

中外法学
北京大学

中外法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.903
ISSN:1002-4875
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)