Judicial jurisdiction often overlaps with administrative divisions in ordinary court settings,where courts'personnel,finances,and resources are managed locally,leading to potential local protec-tionism interference.To reform the judicial jurisdiction system by appropriately separating it from ad-ministrative divisions,two theoretical models exist:comprehensive restructuring and categorical deepe-ning.The comprehensive restructuring model involves systematic adjustments to cases separated from administrative divisions,breaking the current concentration jurisdiction model and promoting the estab-lishment of a cross-administrative court organization system.The categorical deepening model,on the other hand,advocates for gradual reform based on the four existing types of jurisdiction separated from administrative divisions.This model focuses on adjusting cross-administrative jurisdiction in specialized courts,standardizing concentrated jurisdiction in ordinary local courts,improving concentrated jurisdic-tion in railway transport courts,and deepening pilot reforms in cross-administrative courts.This ap-proach aims to achieve a balance between key breakthroughs and overall advancement,creating a new ju-dicial jurisdiction model that addresses the"home and away"litigation issue and constructs a dual organi-zational pattern of cross-administrative courts and ordinary courts working in coordination.
Dual Organizational StructureJudicial JurisdictionAdministrative District CourtSpecialized CourtsCross Administrative Court
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
