首页|法秩序统一视角下的刑民占有关系界定

法秩序统一视角下的刑民占有关系界定

扫码查看
关于如何界定刑法中的占有,学界存在着规范性占有说与事实性占有说的争论,两种观点均存在疑问.依据法秩序统一原理,不同法域对相同社会关系的保护应体现出一致性和协调性,在概念界定上可保持适度差异性.这三项内容可以具体化为界定刑民占有关系的指导原则.据此,民法中的准占有、辅助占有可以引入刑法并用于犯罪的认定,而间接占有和继承占有则不能为刑法所引入.对于由占有衍生的"封缄物的占有"问题,可依据间接占有和辅助占有的原理解决其占有转移和归属问题.对于由占有衍生的"违禁品占有"的问题,是基于刑法的特殊规范目的而设立的,并不违背刑民占有保护的一致性原则和协调性原则,应当为刑法所坚持.基于此,刑法与民法中的占有表现为部分相同又部分不同的交叉关系.
There is an ongoing debate in academia regarding the definition of possession in criminal law,with two main perspectives:the normative possession theory and the factual possession theory.Both viewpoints have their shortcomings.According to the principle of legal order unity,different legal domains should exhibit consistency and coordination in protecting the same social relations,while main-taining appropriate conceptual distinctions.This can be concretized into guiding principles for defining possession in both criminal and civil contexts.Based on this,concepts such as quasi-possession and auxil-iary possession from civil law can be introduced into criminal law for crime determination,whereas indi-rect possession and inherited possession should not be incorporated into criminal law.For issues related to possession derived from"possession of sealed items",the principles of indirect possession and auxiliary possession can be used to address the problems of possession transfer and attribution.As for the issue of"possession of prohibited items",which is established based on the special normative purposes of criminal law and does not conflict with the principles of consistency and coordination in criminal and civil posses-sion protection,it should be upheld by criminal law.For this reason,possession in criminal law and civil law manifests itself in a partly identical and partly different intersection.

Criminal Law PossessionCivil Law PossessionUnity of Legal OrderRelationship Definition

李会彬

展开 >

北京市社会科学院综合治理研究所

刑法占有 民法占有 法秩序统一 关系界定

北京市社会科学基金一般项目

22FBX013

2024

中外法学
北京大学

中外法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.903
ISSN:1002-4875
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)
  • 60