The crime of dangerous operations is categorized as a specific endangerment crime,and it is also a result crime.Subjectively,it is characterized by negligence,while objectively,it involves the ac-tual danger of causing major casualties or other serious consequences.From the perspective of normative theory,the process of determining the attribution of the results of the crime of dangerous operations is di-vided into two stages:"the creation of actual danger"and"the realization of actual danger".In the first stage,the actual danger is assessed based on the violation of duties and the severity of danger signals be-fore the event,while in the second stage,after the event,scenarios where responsibility should not be at-tributed are excluded through an examination of the normative protective purpose and the possibility of a-voiding danger.The establishment of the crime of dangerous operations is not intended to encompass all violations of"relevant safety management regulations".Instead,it aims to regulate three types of serious illegal and irregular behaviors that frequently occur in practice and substantially endanger public safety.In the practice of dealing with minor offenses,judicial authorities should avoid the impulse to criminalize a large number of minor illegal acts while also preventing the crime of dangerous operations from becom-ing a haven for lenient penalties.They should tailor their responses based on the characteristics and cau-ses of the crime,achieving a balance between penalizing and governing such offenses.
Crime of Dangerous OperationNegligenceActual DangerNormative Protection Pur-poseMisdemeanor Management