首页|腹腔镜辅助阴式与经腹子宫切除术的比较分析

腹腔镜辅助阴式与经腹子宫切除术的比较分析

扫码查看
目的::总结分析腹腔镜辅助阴式与经腹子宫切除手术的临床疗效。方法:选择2012年6月~2013年11月期间我院收治的88例子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象,均行子宫切除手术,其中LAVH(腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除手术)组46例,TAH(经腹子宫切除手术)组42例,比较分析两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后发热、阴道残端感染率、血栓静脉炎发生率、胃功能紊乱发生率等观察指标的差异。结果:LAVH组平均手术时间(122.5±21.7)min明显高于TAH组(95.2±12.8) min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);但LAVH组术中出血量(145.2±13.6)ml明显少于TAH组(153.6±15.8)ml,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);TAH组术后血栓静脉炎发生率11.90%、胃肠功能紊乱发生率30.95%明显高于LAVH组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除手术是一种安全有效的术式,具有微创的优势,应用前景广阔。
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy
Objective: To investigate clinical effect of laparoscopic assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Methods: 88 patients with uterine fibroids in our hospital from June 2012 to November 2013 were selected as the study and underwent hysterectomy. 46 cases of LAVH ( laparoscopicaly assisted vaginal hysterectomy ) , 42 cases of TAH ( abdominal hysterectomy ) . The operative time , blood loss, postoperative fever , vaginal stump infection and thrombophlebitis incidence rate of gastric disorders of two groups were compared. Results:After treatment,the mean operative time of LAVH group (122.5±21.7) min was significantly higher than that of TAH group (95.2±12.8) min, (P <0.01); But blood loss of LAVH group (145.2±13.6) ml was significantly less than that of TAH group (153.6±15.8) ml, (P <0.05); the incidence of postoperative thrombophlebitis TAH group (11.90% ), the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders LAVH group( 30.95%)was significantly higher than that of TAH group, (P <0.05). Conclusion:Laparoscopicaly assisted vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and effective procedure, and has the advantages of minimaly invasive application prospects.

hysterectomyLaparoscopicaly assisted vaginal hysterectomyuterine fibroidsclinical effect

宋丽华、张广民

展开 >

内蒙古赤峰市第二医院妇产科 024000

子宫切除手术 腹腔镜辅助阴式切除 子宫肌瘤 临床疗效

2014

中外健康文摘
中国中医药报社

中外健康文摘

影响因子:0.016
ISSN:1672-5085
年,卷(期):2014.(4)
  • 6