首页|无痛分娩在临床中的应用效果及评价

无痛分娩在临床中的应用效果及评价

扫码查看
目的:探讨无痛分娩在临床中的应用效果,以指导临床实践。方法:选取2012年5月~2013年5月在本院待产的孕产妇106例,按其入院时间分为实验组和对照组,各53例。实验组采用硬膜外麻醉无痛分娩法,对照组采用传统自然分娩法,比较两组孕产妇对疼痛的耐受度、产程时间、产后出血量、新生儿窒息率等。结果:实验组产妇的疼痛耐受度优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组第一产程时间为(227.5±94.6)min,对照组第一产程时间为(358.1±224.7)min,实验组明显短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组在产后出血量[实验组(173±52.1)ml、对照组(169±49.6)ml]、新生儿窒息率[实验组3.8%、对照组5.7%]等方面的差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无痛分娩可降低产妇的疼痛程度,缩短产程,对母婴无不良影响,临床疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the effect of painless labor in clinic, and to guide clinical practice. Methods: From 2012 May to 2013 May in our hospital 106 cases of pregnant women, according to the time of admission were divided into experimental group and control group, 53 cases in each. The experimental group used epidural anesthesia for painless labor, the control group using the traditional natural childbirth, compared two groups of pregnant women on pain tolerance, labor time, postpartum bleeding, neonatal asphyxia rate. Results:The woman in pain tolerance than the control group, the difference was statistical y significant (P<0.05); the experimental group the first stage of labor time was (227.5±94.6) min, the time of the first stage as the control group (358.1±224.7) min, the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, the difference was statistical y significant (P<0.05); two groups in the amount of postpartum hemorrhage [experimental group (173±52.1) ml, the control group (169±49.6) ml], the rate of neonatal asphyxia [experimental group 3.8%, contrast group 5.7%], there was no statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion: Painless childbirth can reduce the pain degree of maternal, shorten the birth process, no adverse effects on mother and infant, clinical efficacy, is worthy of clinical application.

Painless childbirthEpidural anesthesiaThe clinical curative effect

雷桂芳

展开 >

广西桂林灵川县三一零医院妇产科 541213

无痛分娩 硬膜外麻醉 临床疗效

2014

中外健康文摘
中国中医药报社

中外健康文摘

影响因子:0.016
ISSN:1672-5085
年,卷(期):2014.(5)
  • 2