首页|伊班膦酸钠和帕米膦酸二钠治疗骨转移癌疼痛的临床观察

伊班膦酸钠和帕米膦酸二钠治疗骨转移癌疼痛的临床观察

Clinical observation of Ibandronate and Pamidronate in Treatment of Pain Caused by Bone Metastasis

扫码查看
目的:评价伊班膦酸钠和帕米膦酸二钠治疗骨转移癌疼痛的临床疗效和安全性。方法62例患者随机分为伊班膦酸钠组和帕米膦酸二钠组各31例,伊斑膦酸钠组给予伊班膦酸钠治疗,帕米膦酸二钠组给予帕米膦酸二钠治疗,2组均用药2~6个周期。观察2组用药后止痛效果、骨修复、活动能力及不良反应发生情况。结果用药第14天时伊班膦酸钠组临床获益率为87.1%高于帕米膦酸二钠组的64.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗56d伊班膦酸钠组临床获益率为90.3%,帕米膦酸二钠组为83.8%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。2组主要不良反应主要为发热、乏力,严重程度与骨质损害呈相关。结论伊班膦酸钠治疗骨转移癌疼痛疗效略优于帕米膦酸二钠,两者不良反应均较轻,均有良好的耐受性,值得临床推广应用。
0bjective To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect and safeness of ibandronate and pamidronate in treating pain caused by bone metastasis.Methods 62 cases were randomly divided into ibandronate group and pamidronate group,31 cases of each.The ibandronate group was treated with ibandronate,while the pamidronate group was treated with. Both groups were treated for 2 to 6 cylces.Observed 2 group’s odynolysis effect,situations of bone reparation,activity ability and adverse reaction.Results On the 14th day of administration,the clinical benefit rate of ibandronate group was 87.1% higher than 64.5% of the pamidronate group,and the difference was statistical y significant(P<0.05). On the 56th day of administration.the clinical benefit rate of ibandronate group was 90.3% higher than 83.8% of the pamidronate group,and the difference was of no statistical significance(P>0.05).The main adverse reactions of 2 groups were fewer and weakness,and the severity had positive correlation with bone damage.Conclusion Ibandronate has good curative effects above pamidronate in treating pain caused by bone metastasis.Both of the two drugs has slight adverse reaction and good tolerance.Which are worth clinical popularizing and application.

IbandronatePamidronateBone metastasisEfficacy

杨钰贤、江艺、林丹霞、方玫玫、郑瑾、陈志明

展开 >

汕头大学医学院附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科 广东汕头 515031

伊班磷酸钠 帕米膦酸二钠 骨转移癌 疗效

2014

中外健康文摘
中国中医药报社

中外健康文摘

影响因子:0.016
ISSN:1672-5085
年,卷(期):2014.(8)
  • 2