摘要
目的：研究分析急性心肌梗死静脉溶栓及冠状动脉介入治疗的对比性。方法：从我院急性心肌梗死患者中选取78例进行研究，并按照治疗方法将其分为治疗组（采用冠状动脉介入治疗方法进行治疗）和对照组（采用静脉溶栓治疗方法进行治疗），各为39例，对比两组患者梗死相关血管再通率、心功能状况、死亡率及住院时间。结果：对比两组患者治疗后梗死相关血管再通率、心功能状况、死亡率及住院时间，存在明显差异性，P＜0.05。结论：冠状动脉介入治疗在治疗急性心肌梗死疾病临床上效果显著，其可有效提高梗死相关血管再通率、改善患者心功能、降低患者死亡率及缩短患者住院时间。
Abstract
objective: to study the analysis of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery intervention treatment of comparative. Methods: select 78 cases from our hospital patients with acute myocardial infarction (mi) is studied, and according to the treatment wil be divided into the treatment group (treated with coronary artery intervention treatment method) and the control group (treatment, intravenous thrombolysis treatment), each for 39 cases, compared two groups of patients with infarction related blood vessels, the condition of heart function, mortality rate and length of hospital stay. Results: compared with two groups of patients after infarction related blood vessels, the condition of heart function, mortality rate and length of hospital stay, the obvious difference, P < 0.05. Conclusion: coronary artery interventional therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction disease clinical effect significantly, it can effectively increase the infarction related blood vessels, improving the rate of patients with cardiac function, reduce mortality and shorten their hospital stay.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据