首页|文拉法辛与阿米替林治疗抑郁症对照研究

文拉法辛与阿米替林治疗抑郁症对照研究

A Control study of venlafaxine vs amitriptyline in the treatment of depression

扫码查看
目的:评价文拉法辛治疗抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法将76例抑郁症患者随机分为两组各38例,研究组口服文拉法辛治疗,对照组口服阿米替林治疗,观察6w。于治疗前及治疗1w、2w、4w、6w末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定临床疗效,治疗中副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果研究组显效率为73.7%,有效率89.5%;对照组分别为68.4%及86.8%。两组治疗1w末起汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分均较治疗前有极显著性下降(P均<0.01),并随治疗时间的延续呈持续性下降之;治疗2w、4w末研究组较对照组下降显著(P<0.05),6w末无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组不良反应程度均轻微,经对症处理后症状可缓解。结论文拉法辛治疗抑郁症疗效与阿米替林相当,但文拉法辛起效快,安全性高,依从性好。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and asfety of venlafaxine in the treatment of depression.Methods:76 depression patients were randomly assigned to venlafaxine group(n=38)and amitriptyline group (n=38)for 6weeks.Clinical efficacies were assessed with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD)and adverse effects with the Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale(TESS)before teratment and at the ends of the 1st,2nd,4th and 6th week treatment.Results:Excellece and effectiveness rates were respectively 73.7%and 89.5% in the research group and 68.4%and 86.8% in the control group.Since the end of the 1st week,The HAMD scores of both groups lowered very significantly compared with pretreatment (both P<0.01) and did continiously fol owing time of therapy lasting;;at the ends of both groups lowered very significantly compared with pretreatment (both P<0.01)and did continiously fol owing time of therapy lasting;at the ends of the 2nd and 4th week,those did more significantly in the research than in the control group(P<0.05).Their extents were mild and could relieve and disappear after symptomatic treatment.Conclusion:Venlafaxine has equivalent efficacy to amitriptyline,higher safety and better compliance,and takes fefects faster in the treament of depression.

Depressionvenlafaxineamitriptyline

王巍

展开 >

锦州市康宁医院 辽宁锦州 121013

抑郁症 文拉法辛 阿米替林

2014

中外健康文摘
中国中医药报社

中外健康文摘

影响因子:0.016
ISSN:1672-5085
年,卷(期):2014.(14)
  • 1