Objective: To discuss and study the clinical significance and impact of UEMID for treatment of BGH. Method: 100 patients with BGH were randomly chosen and divided into A and B group. A group was given medication conservative treatment while B group was given UEMID. Activity of daily living (ADL), neural functional recovery ability and total treatment effective rate of the 2 groups were compared. Result: After treatment, neural functional recovery ability of B group was obviously higher than A group (P<0.05); ADL of B group was obviously higher than A group (P<0.05). Conclusion: UEMID for treatment of BGH can melt hematoma and drain it through puncture needle and eliminate hematoma effectively at the greatest extent. It can directly relieve oppression and injury, and restore nerve cellin a short time. It can help patients recover their neurological function and living ability quickly and improve clinical effective rate obviously and promote prognosis.
Basal GangliaCerebral HemorrhageUEMIDClinical Effect and Impact