逻辑决定论的蹊跷性
On the Queerness of Logical Determinism
颜青山 1裴雪娟2
作者信息
- 1. 华东师范大学哲学系
- 2. 上海小词科技有限公司
- 折叠
摘要
逻辑决定论是宿命论的两种形式之一,其表述形式可以区分为激进版本(包含模态词"必然")和温和版本(包含时间概念"总是").既有对逻辑决定论的解决方式大致可方便地区分为语义学和逻辑学两类方案,这些方案都或多或少会导致其他困难.进一步的分析表明,一个基于激进版本的推论会导致矛盾的模态关系,从而导致激进版本被排除.而在温和版本中,"总是"存在着物理的和非物理的理解,真值作为非物理对象一旦被给予具体的时间属性,就会导致麦基式的蹊跷性(queerness),由此构造的命题表达式将全部是假的.因此,逻辑决定论不成立.
Abstract
As one form of fatalism,logical determinism has two versions,radical(with modal term necessarily)and moderate(with temporal term all the time).The solutions of this problem can approximately and conveniently be divieded into semantic and logical approaches.A further analysis manifests that several inferences based on the radical version leads to a contradictory relation in modal logic and thus this version can be ignored.In moderate version,whereas we have two kinds of understanding of the temporal term"all the time",physical and nonphisical.Once the truth-values as nonphysical objects are attributed into a concrete temporal proporty,that leads to the Mackiean Queerness.So the propositions containing such phrases are all false.Therefore,logical determinism is not true.
关键词
逻辑决定论/激进版本和温和版本/蹊跷性Key words
logical determinism/radical and moderate/queerness引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据