底线思维与科技审度:高风险社会治理的要义与进路
Bottom-line Thinking and Reconsideration of Science and Technology:The Essence and Approach of High-risk Social Governance
刘益东1
作者信息
摘要
当前AI大爆发及其应对乏力表明,西方科技发展模式的缺陷与人类社会的脆弱及学界研究的薄弱,更加凸显人类风险防控机制存在诸多漏洞及其引发的科技危机与人类安全危机,已把人类带入高风险社会.用底线思维与刘大椿提出的科技审度予以破解:底线思维解决非共识下的议而不决;科技审度和审度思维所特有的执两用中、包容互补、多元开放、整合升级、共识决策等,可提供有效的治理对策.科技转型是治理科技风险的根本解决之道,科技审度可发挥重要的启发与引导作用,以构建真善美的新型科技发展模式,加快世界科学中心建设,据此总结出高风险社会治理的要义与进路,以作为科技风险治理的研究指南.
Abstract
The current AI outbreak and the poor response to it reveal that the shortcomings of the mainstream scientific development model,the fragility of human society,and the weakness of academic research further highlight those loopholes in human risk prevention and control mechanism,as well as the scientific and human security crises caused by them,which have brought humanity into a high-risk society.The solution lies in bottom-line thinking and Prof.Liu Dachun's reconsideration of science and technology.Bottom-line thinking solves non-consensus indecisiveness,while scientific reconsideration and reconsideration thinking uniquely featured by impartiality,inclusiveness and complementarity,diversity and openness,integration and upgradation,consensus decision-making,etc.,can provide effective governance countermeasures.Scientific transformation is the fundamental solution to managing scientific risks.The scientific reconsideration can play an important enlightening and guiding role in building up a new model of scientific development that is true,virtuous,beautiful and holy.On this basis,this paper summarizes the essence and approach of high-risk social governance as research guidelines for scientific risk governance.
关键词
科技审度/高风险社会/动车困境/误识内卷/科技重大风险Key words
reconsideration of science and technology/high risk society/emu train's dilemma,involution of mistaken recognition,catastrophic risks of s&t引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据