首页|不同新型炎症标志物用于MAFLD/NAFLD的诊断价值分析

不同新型炎症标志物用于MAFLD/NAFLD的诊断价值分析

扫码查看
目的 目前缺乏有效的临床生物标志物来诊断非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)和代谢相关性脂肪肝(MAFLD),本研究旨在分析几种潜在的新型炎症生物标志物,如MHR、NLR、PLR、LMR、SII以及NHR,评价它们在NAFLD/MAFLD诊断中的预测价值.方法 本研究收集了2022年于南京中医药大学附属医院诊断为NAFLD/MAFLD患者的临床数据,使用Mann-Whitney U检验和二元logistic回归分析来评估6种新型炎症生物标志物与NAFLD/MAFLD之间的关联性,并根据计算曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量这些标志物对NAFLD/MAFLD的预测效能.结果 纳入NAFLD(400 例)和MAFLD(405 )共805 例,MAFLD组在年龄、AST、GGT、ALT、肌酐、尿素、TG、TC、FIB-4指数等与NAFLD组相比显示出统计学差异(P<0.001 ),而AST/ALT比值、ALP、尿酸在组间相似(P>0.05).6种炎症指标在两组间均有显著差异(P<0.001).回归分析显示年龄、MHR、FPG、TG、LDL-c和FIB-4指数是MAFLD的独立风险因素.利用这6个风险因素建立的ROC曲线分析:MHR的AUC为0.816,最佳截断值为0.451,敏感度为0.956,特异度为0.65,约登指数为0.606,表现出良好的预测效能.将上述6个风险因素组合后,联合预测模型的AUC达到0.941,敏感度和特异度分别为0.862和0.885,约登指数为0.747,表明综合6种因素可显著提高对MAFLD的预测效能.结论 相较于NAFLD患者,MAFLD患者在肝功能、血脂等代谢异常及肝纤维化风险上的程度更为严重.MHR结合AGE、FPG、TG、LDL-c和FIB-4指数作为联合预测模型,具有更高的预测价值,值得临床应用和推广.
Diagnostic value analysis of different new inflammatory markers in MAFLD/NAFLD
Objective At present,there are no effective clinical biomarkers to diagnose NAFLD and metabolic related fatty liver (MAFLD).The purpose of this study is to analyze several potential new inflammatory biomark-ers,such as MHR,NLR,PLR,LMR,SⅡ and NHR,and evaluate their predictive value in the diagnosis of NAFLD/MAFLD.Methods The clinical data of patients diagnosed as NAFLD/MAFLD in the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine in 2022 were collected.Mann-Whitney U test and binary logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the correlation between these six new inflammatory biomarkers and NAFLD/MAFLD,and the predictive efficacy of these markers for NAFLD/MAFLD was measured according to the AUC.Results There were 805 cases of NAFLD (400 cases)and MAFLD (405 cases).The age,AST,GGT,ALT,creatinine,urea,TG,TC and fibrosis index (FIB-4)in MAFLD group were significantly different from those in NAFLD group (P<0.001),while ALP,uric acid,and the ratio of AST/ALT was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05 ).There were significant differences in six inflammatory indexes be-tween the two groups (P<0.001 ).Regression analysis showed that age,MHR,FPG,TG,LDL-c and FIB-4 were independent risk factors for MAFLD.The ROC curve analysis based on these six risk factors showed that the AUC of MHR is 0.816,the best cutoff value is 0.451,the sensitivity is 0.956,the specificity is 0.65,and the Jordan index is 0.606,indicating a good prediction efficiency.After combining the above six risk factors,the AUC,sensitivity and specificity of the joint forecasting model are 0.941,0.862 and 0.885,respectively,and the Jordan index is 0.747,which indicates that combining these six factors can significantly improve the forecasting efficiency of MAFLD.Conclusion Compared with NAFLD patients,patients with MAFLD have more serious risk of metabolic abnormalities such as liver function,blood lipid,and liver fibrosis.MHR combined with AGE,FPG,TG,LDL-c and FIB-4 as a joint prediction model has higher prediction value and is worthy of clinical application and popularization.

metabolic-related fatty livernew inflammatory indexFIB-4MHR

张静莹、孙倩倩、戴恒、史会连

展开 >

南京中医药大学附属医院呼吸科,江苏 南京 210029

南京中医药大学附属医院感染科,江苏 南京 210029

代谢相关性脂肪肝 新型炎症指标 FIB-4指数 单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比率

2024

遵义医科大学学报
遵义医科大学

遵义医科大学学报

CSTPCD
ISSN:2096-8159
年,卷(期):2024.47(12)