首页|F形空心螺钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折有效性和安全性的Meta分析

F形空心螺钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折有效性和安全性的Meta分析

扫码查看
目的:系统评价F形空心螺钉内固定术治疗股骨颈骨折(femoral neck fracture,FNF)的有效性和安全性。方法:检索中国知网、万方数据库、维普网、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science中比较F形空心螺钉内固定术(F形固定组)与3 枚空心螺钉平行内固定术(平行固定组)治疗FNF有效性和安全性的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,检索时限均为2011 年1 月1 日至2024 年5 月1 日。由2 名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取数据并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Stata16。0 软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入11 项研究,其中非随机对照试验 7 项、随机对照试验4 项;共涉及846 例患者,其中F形固定组425 例、平行固定组 421 例。Meta分析结果显示,与平行固定组相比,F形固定组住院时间更短[MD=-2。45,95%CI(-3。42,-1。47),P=0。000]、复位满意率更高[OR=3。49,95%CI(1。88,6。48),P=0。000]、骨折愈合更快[MD=-0。72,95%CI(-0。93,-0。50),P=0。000]、末次随访髋部疼痛视觉模拟量表评分更低[MD=-2。07,95%CI(-2。39,-1。74),P=0。000]、末次随访Harris评分更高[MD=7。62,95%CI(3。52,11。71),P=0。000]、股骨头坏死发生率更低[OR=0。32,95%CI(0。17,0。61),P=0。001]、骨折不愈合发生率更低[OR=0。42,95%CI(0。23,0。78),P=0。006]、股骨颈短缩发生率更低[OR=0。40,95%CI(0。23,0。69),P=0。001]、内固定失效发生率更低[OR=0。25,95%CI(0。13,0。51),P=0。000];2 组手术时间、术中出血量、术中X线透视时间的差异均无统计学意义。分别采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型对上述结局指标进行Meta分析,所得结果基本相似,表明研究结果稳健可靠。基于末次随访Harris评分进行发表偏倚分析,Egger's检验结果提示不存在发表偏倚(P=0。114)。结论:现有证据表明,相较于传统的3 枚空心螺钉平行内固定术,采用F形空心螺钉内固定术治疗FNF临床疗效更好、安全性更高,且不会增加手术操作难度,也不会对患者造成额外创伤。
Clinical outcomes and safety of F-shaped hollow screw internal fixation for treatment of femoral neck frac-ture:a meta-analysis
Objective:To systematically review the clinical outcomes and safety of F-shaped hollow screw internal fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture(FNF).Methods:All the randomized controlled trial(RCT)and non-RCT articles about the clinical outcomes and safety of F-shaped hollow screw internal fixation(F-shaped fixation group)versus three hollow screws parallel internal fixation(parallel fixa-tion group)for treatment of FNF included from January 1,2011 to May 1,2024 were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastruc-ture,Wanfang Database,Vip Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase and Web of Sci-ence.The pertinent articles were screened,the information was extracted and the risk of bias of the included researches was assessed inde-pendently by two researchers,and then a Meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata16.0 software.Results:Eleven articles(846 patients)were included in the final analysis,including 7 non-RCT articles,and 4 RCT articles.Four hundred and twenty-five patients in F-shaped fix-ation group,and 421 ones in parallel fixation group.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that the hospital stay was shorter,the reduction satisfaction rate and the Harris score measured at the last follow-up were higher,the fracture healing was faster,the hip pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score measured at the last follow-up and the incidence rates of femur head necrosis(FHN),fracture nonunion,femoral neck shortening and failed internal fixation were lower in F-shaped fixation group compared to parallel fixation group(MD=-2.45,95%CI(-3.42,-1.47),P=0.000;OR=3.49,95%CI(1.88,6.48),P=0.000;MD=7.62,95%CI(3.52,11.71),P=0.000;MD=-0.72,95%CI(-0.93,-0.50),P=0.000;MD=-2.07,95%CI(-2.39,-1.74),P=0.000;OR=0.32,95%CI(0.17,0.61),P=0.001;OR=0.42,95%CI(0.23,0.78),P=0.006;OR=0.40,95%CI(0.23,0.69),P=0.001;OR=0.25,95%CI(0.13,0.51),P=0.000);while,the differences in operative time,intraoperative blood loss,and intraoperative X-ray exposure were not statistically signifi-cant between the 2 groups.A re-evaluation was further performed on the aforementioned outcome indicators by employing a fixed-effect model and a random-effect model,respectively,and the results showcased that no evident change was found in the result of each outcome in-dicator,suggesting the results of the Meta-analysis in this study were relatively stable and reliable.Moreover,the publication bias was ana-lyzed based on the Harris score measured at the last follow-up,and the result of Bgger's test showed that there was no publication bias in the included articles(P=0.114).Conclusion:Available evidences suggest that,compared to the traditional parallel internal fixation with three hollow screws,the F-shaped hollow screw internal fixation behaves better in clinical outcomes and safety in the treatment of FNF,with-out increasing the difficulty of surgical operation or causing additional trauma to the patients.

femoral neck fracturesfracture fixation,internalbone screwsmeta-analysis as topic

邝孝坤、田可为、范克杰、马文龙、刘英科、严嘉祥、田燃、陈柯

展开 >

河南中医药大学研究生院,河南 郑州 450046

河南省洛阳正骨医院/河南省骨科医院,河南 洛阳 471002

股骨颈骨折 骨折固定术,内 骨螺丝 专题Meta分析

河南省医学科技攻关计划项目河南省重点研发与推广专项项目河南省中医药科学研究专项课题河南省中医药科学研究专项课题

LHGJ2023048318210231046720-21ZY225320-21ZY2238

2024

中医正骨
河南省正骨研究院

中医正骨

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.912
ISSN:1001-6015
年,卷(期):2024.36(7)