刑事二审发回重审制度实证研究——以河南省为例
Empirical Study on the System of Criminal Second Trial and Retrial
张志英 1付丽荧1
作者信息
- 1. 郑州大学 法学院,河南 郑州 450001
- 折叠
摘要
刑事二审发回重审制度融合了保障人权和司法监督之双重功能,但在制度运行中异化为发回重审不开庭、发回标准不清晰、司法说理不明确和发回重审适用率大于改判的乱象,制度预设的保障与监督功能无法实现.在刑事诉讼法再修改的背景下,应当坚持无罪推定的精神,对刑事二审发回重审制度进行完善.首先,在发回标准上,完善实体性和程序性发回重审的规定;其次,在审判方式上,应当开庭审理;再次,在重审法院选择上,将范围扩大到原审法院之外的其他同级法院;最后,限制程序性发回的次数.
Abstract
The system of remanding for retrial in criminal second instance combines the dual functions of safeguard-ing human rights and judicial supervision.However,in the operation of the system,it has been alienated into chaos such as remanding for retrial without a court hearing,unclear standards for remanding for trial,unclear judicial reasoning,and a higher application rate of remanding for retrial than changing judgments.The preset functions of protection and supervision in the system cannot be realized.In the context of the re-vision of the new Criminal Procedure Law,we should improve the system of remanding for retrial in crimi-nal second instance in the spirit of presumption of innocence.Firstly,improve the regulations on substan-tive and procedural remanding for retrial in terms of the criteria for remand;Secondly,in terms of trial methods,a court hearing should be held;Thirdly,in the selection of retrial courts,the scope will be ex-panded to other courts of the same level outside the original trial court;Finally,limit the number of times of procedural remanding for retrial.
关键词
刑事二审发回重审/实体性事由/程序性事由/实证研究Key words
remanding for retrial in criminal second instance/substantive reasons/procedural reasons/empirical re-search引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据