首页|民法典编纂知识史与当代中国民法典特色

民法典编纂知识史与当代中国民法典特色

扫码查看
从知识史的视角来梳理近代欧洲民法典编纂,无疑会为理解当代中国民法典提供重要的知识支援以及反思的参照物.中西古今都存在集合式的法律汇编,而在理性思想指导下,以特定的工商经济需要作为基础,围绕个人权利本位,进而实现民族国家法律统一,并以逻辑化、体系化方式编纂民法典,是近代欧陆民法法系的现象.防止法官擅断,实现权力平衡,满足自由竞争经济,划定个人与国家的法律边界,构成了近代欧洲民法典的立法用意.然而,法国、德国的民法典对公共福祉失却先见,更遑论对社会伦理、实质正义进行回应.《中华人民共和国民法典》既汲取以往的民法典编纂经验,又弥补其缺失,在恪守逻辑化、体系化的同时,始终以中国的现实生活为鹄的,在保障个人权益,促进社会主体创造性、积极性时,注重个人权利与社会利益实现平衡.实践中,面对个人权利与社会利益内在的张力,需严守职业主义与现代知识分工,以法律教义学方法兼顾民法典内在体系与外在体系的融贯,以敏感识见、精细操作的解释论来解决.
On the History of Knowledge of Compiling Civil Code and the Characteristics of Civil Code of Contemporary China
To sort out codification of civil law in modern Europe from the perspective of history of knowledge undoubtedly provides important knowledge support and reflection reference for understanding the civil code of contemporary China's codification from the perspective of intellectual history.There have existed gathering-style collection of laws in both China and the West,ancient and modern,while it is a phenomenon in civil-law system of modern Europe to,under the guidance of rational thought,based on the specific industrial and commercial needs,centered on the individual rights,realize the legal unity within a nation state and compile civil code in a logical and systematic manner.To prevent judges from making arbitrary judgments,to achieve a balance of power,to accommodate the economy of free competition,and to delineate legal boundaries between individuals and the State constitute the legislative intent of the civil codes in modern Europe.However,the civil codes of France and Germany lacked the foresight of public welfare and public good,let alone responding to social ethics and substantive justice.The Civil Code of China not only absorbed the good parts of the civil codes in the past,but also repaired their shortcomings,and at the same time of sticking to logic and systematization,always looks to the real life in China,pay attention to achieving the balance between individual rights and social interests while securing individuals'rights and interests,promoting the creation and proactiveness of social subjects.In practice,regarding the inherent tension between individuals'rights and interests and social interests,it is necessary to stick to the professionalism and division of modem knowledge,take the coherence of both internal and external systems of civil code into account by means of legal dogmatic method,and reach a resolution through the doctrine of interpretation which is sensitive in knowledge and intelligence and fine-tuned in operation.

Rational ThoughtCodification of Civil CodeExperiences and LessonsChinese Characteristics

苏彦新

展开 >

华东政法大学法律学院,上海 200042

理性思想 民法典编纂 经验教训 中国特色

国家社会科学基金

23BFX210

2024

政治与法律
上海社会科学院法学研究所

政治与法律

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.545
ISSN:1005-9512
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 58