首页|论共犯违法所得处理的责任模式

论共犯违法所得处理的责任模式

扫码查看
不同于个人犯罪的违法所得处理,共犯责任模式的确立和运用较为复杂,这已经成为目前我国司法实践的一大难题.连带责任理论的主流观点面临从违法性共同到违法所得处理连带的简单推导、多重原因与共犯个人责任理论的背离、理论根基与共犯客观因果关系脱节等诸多问题,其不应作为普遍方法.违法所得处理性质和范围的两大基础因素能够对共犯责任模式的选择产生重大影响,违法所得处理的独立性刑罚附随措施以及团体获取全部财产的范围,决定了共犯需要在个人提供的团体作用力范围内对团体违法所得承担责任.为全面评价共犯作用力范围内团体违法所得的责任承担,刑法应塑造作用力责任理论.作用力责任理论并非团体责任和个人责任的简单化组合,其在多元正义责任理论的基本指引下,涵盖了共犯作用力的团体违法所得的责任对象、个人作用力范围内的按份责任的两方面内容.作用力责任理论的共犯违法所得处理可以在确定按份标准的基础上,对客观无法追缴的共犯份额外的责任承担进行类型化分析.
On the Liability Model in Handling the Illegal Gains of an Accomplice
Unlike the handling of illegal gains from an crime committed by a single person,the establishment and application of the liability model of an accomplice are more complex,which has become a significantly difficult issue in China's judicial practice.The mainstream view of the joint and several liability theory faces numerous problems,such as the simple deduction from joint illegality to joint and several handling of illegal gains,the deviation between multiple causes and the theory of individual liability of an accomplice,and the disconnection between theoretical foundation and objective causality of an accomplice,thus it should not be taken as an universal method.The two fundamental factors of the nature and scope of the handling of illegal gains can have a significant impact on the choice of the liability model of an accomplice,and the independent penalty-accompanying measures for the handling of illegal gains and the scope of all property obtained by participants as a group determine that an accomplice needs to assume liability for such group's illegal gains within the scope of his/her individual contribution to the group.In order to comprehensively evaluate the liability for the group's illegal gains within the scope of their individual contribution,the theory of contribution-based liability should be developed for the criminal law.The theory of contribution-based liability is not a simple combination of group liability and individual liability,instead it,under the basic guidance of the theory of liability based on pluralistic justice,covers two aspects,i.e.the liability object of illegal gains in the context of an accomplice's contribution,and the several liability within the scope of individual contribution.It is able to regarding the handling of illegal gains of an accomplice based on the theory of contribution-based liability,it is able to,on basis of determining the standard for severing liability,make a categorized analysis of the assumption of liability for the illegal gains which cannot be the objectively recovered and are beyond the several liability of an accomplice.

AccompliceIllegal GainsJoint and Several LiabilityContribution-based LiabilityJoint Crime

熊波

展开 >

华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海 200042

共犯 违法所得 连带责任 作用力责任 共同犯罪

国家社会科学基金青年项目上海市教育委员会、上海市教育发展基金会"晨光计划"资助项目

22CFX015

2024

政治与法律
上海社会科学院法学研究所

政治与法律

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.545
ISSN:1005-9512
年,卷(期):2024.(7)
  • 1
  • 33