Journal of dairy science2022,Vol.105Issue(12) :9297-9326.DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-22091

Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options

Karen A. Beauchemin Emilio M. Ungerfeld Adibe L. Abdalla Clementina Alvarez Claudia Arndt Philippe Becquet Chaouki Benchaar Alexandre Berndt Rogerio M. Mauricio Tim A. McAllister Walter Oyhantçabal Saheed A. Salami Laurence Shalloo Yan Sun Juan Tricarico Aimable Uwizeye Camillo De Camillis Martial Bernoux Timothy Robinson Ermias Kebreab
Journal of dairy science2022,Vol.105Issue(12) :9297-9326.DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-22091

Invited review: Current enteric methane mitigation options

Karen A. Beauchemin 1Emilio M. Ungerfeld 2Adibe L. Abdalla 3Clementina Alvarez 4Claudia Arndt 5Philippe Becquet 6Chaouki Benchaar 7Alexandre Berndt 8Rogerio M. Mauricio 9Tim A. McAllister 1Walter Oyhantçabal 10Saheed A. Salami 11Laurence Shalloo 12Yan Sun 13Juan Tricarico 14Aimable Uwizeye 15Camillo De Camillis 15Martial Bernoux 16Timothy Robinson 15Ermias Kebreab17
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada
  • 2. Centro Regional de Investigacion Carillanca, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA, Vilcun, La Araucania 4880000, Chile
  • 3. Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo CEP 13416.000, Brazil
  • 4. Research Department, TINE SA, As, 1430, Norway
  • 5. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • 6. International Feed Industry Federation, Wiehl 51657, Germany
  • 7. Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1M 0C8, Canada
  • 8. Embrapa Southeast Livestock, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 234, CP 339. Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo CEP 13.560-970, Brazil
  • 9. Department of Biosystems Engineering, Federal University of Sao Joao Del Rey, Sao Joao, Minas Gerais 36325.000, Brazil
  • 10. Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, 12900, Uruguay
  • 11. Solutions Deployment Team, Alltech (UK) Ltd., Ryhall Road, Stamford, PE9 1TZ, United Kingdom
  • 12. Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Department, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork P61 C996, Ireland
  • 13. Cargill Inc., Minneapolis, MN 55440
  • 14. Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy, Rosemont, IL 60018
  • 15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division, Rome, 00153, Italy
  • 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Office of Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, Rome, 00153, Italy
  • 17. Department of Animal Science, University of California–Davis, Davis 95616
  • 折叠

Abstract

Ruminant livestock are an important source of anthropogenicmethane (CH_4). Decreasing the emissionsof enteric CH_4 from ruminant production is strategicto limit the global temperature increase to 1.5℃ by2050. Research in the area of enteric CH_4 mitigationhas grown exponentially in the last 2 decades, withvarious strategies for enteric CH_4 abatement beinginvestigated: production intensification, dietary manipulation(including supplementation and processingof concentrates and lipids, and management of forageand pastures), rumen manipulation (supplementationof ionophores, 3-nitrooxypropanol, macroalgae, alternativeelectron acceptors, and phytochemicals), and selectionof low-CH_4-producing animals. Other enteric CH_4mitigation strategies are at earlier stages of research butrapidly developing. Herein, we discuss and analyze thecurrent status of available enteric CH_4 mitigation strategieswith an emphasis on opportunities and barriersto their implementation in confined and partial grazingproduction systems, and in extensive and fully grazingproduction systems. For each enteric CH_4 mitigationstrategy, we discuss its effectiveness to decrease totalCH_4 emissions and emissions on a per animal productbasis, safety issues, impacts on the emissions of othergreenhouse gases, as well as other economic, regulatory,and societal aspects that are key to implementation.Most research has been conducted with confinedanimals, and considerably more research is needed todevelop, adapt, and evaluate antimethanogenic strategiesfor grazing systems. In general, few options arecurrently available for extensive production systemswithout feed supplementation. Continuous research anddevelopment are needed to develop enteric CH_4 mitigationstrategies that are locally applicable. Informationis needed to calculate carbon footprints of interventionson a regional basis to evaluate the impact of mitigationstrategies on net greenhouse gas emissions. Economicallyaffordable enteric CH_4 mitigation solutions areurgently needed. Successful implementation of safe andeffective antimethanogenic strategies will also requiredelivery mechanisms and adequate technical supportfor producers, as well as consumer involvement and acceptance.The most appropriate metrics should be usedin quantifying the overall climate outcomes associatedwith mitigation of enteric CH_4 emissions. A holistic approach is required, and buy-in is needed at all levels ofthe supply chain.

Key words

antimethanogenic strategies/climate change/methane/mitigation/ruminants

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2022
Journal of dairy science

Journal of dairy science

ISSN:0022-0302
被引量22
参考文献量204
段落导航相关论文