首页|Reports on Machine Learning Findings from Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Provide New Insights (Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback To Instructors: a Systematic Review)
Reports on Machine Learning Findings from Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Provide New Insights (Natural Language Processing of Student's Feedback To Instructors: a Systematic Review)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域,可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
IEEE
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News – Fresh data on Machine Learning are presented in a new report. According to news orig- inating from Lyngby, Denmark, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, “Course developers, providers and instructors gather feedback from students to gain insights into student satisfaction, success, and diffi- culties in the learning process. The traditional manual analysis is time-consuming and resource-intensive, resulting in decreased insights and pedagogical impact.” Financial support for this research came from Digital Research Centre Denmark. Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), “To address the problems, researchers use natural language processing techniques that apply the fields of machine learning, statistics and artificial intelligence to the feedback datasets for various purposes. These purposes include predicting sentiment, opinion research, insights into students’ views of the course, and so on. The aim of this study is to identify themes and categories in academic research reports that use natural language processing for student feedback. Previous review studies have focused exclusively on sentiment analysis and specific techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning. Our study put forward a comprehensive synthesis of various aspects, from the data to the methods used, to the data translation and labeling efforts, and to the categorization of prediction/analysis targets in the literature. The synthesis includes two tables that allow the reader to compare the studies themselves and present the identified themes and categorizations in one figure and text. The methods, tools and data of 28 peer- reviewed papers are synthesized in 20 categories under six themes: aim and categorization, methods and models, and tools and data (size and context, language, and labeling).”
LyngbyDenmarkEuropeCyborgsEmerging TechnologiesMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingTechnical University of Denmark (DTU)