Abstract
New research on Oncology - Cervical Cancer is the subject of a report. According to news reporting originating from Toronto, Canada, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, “A randomized non-inferiority trial showed worse survival in women with early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach compared to laparotomy; the impact of surgical approach on survival following radical trachelectomy is unknown. To examine oncologic outcomes in women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robotic or vaginal radical trachelectomy at Canadian cancer centers with the highest volumes of radical trachelectomy procedures.” Our news editors obtained a quote from the research from the University of Toronto, “Retrospective multi-centre cohort analysis which includes patients who had surgery between 2006 and 2019. Women with International FIGO 2009 stage IA-IB cervical cancer who underwent radical trachelectomy and lymph node assessment were grouped by surgical approach (vaginal versus robotic surgery). A total of 197 patients were included from 4 regional referral centres. 56 women underwent robotic radical trachelectomy and 141 underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy. All patients had lymph node assessment by a minimally invasive technique. Median age was 32 years, median tumor size was 12 mm, and median depth of invasion was 5 mm. Recurrence-free survival was 97% in both groups at a median follow-up of 57 months. On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for previously chosen confounders (high risk pathologic criteria, tumor size, and LVSI) there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (HR 2.1, 95%CI 0.3-7.1, p = 0.5). Tumor size larger than 2 cm (HR 9.4, 95%CI 2.8-26, p = 0.003) was the only variable predictive of recurrence. Survival outcomes were excellent in both cohorts of patients undergoing robotic vs. vaginal radical trachelectomy.”
NETL
NSTL