首页|Chiang Mai University Reports Findings in Robotics (Accuracy of implant placemen t with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robotassisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials)
Chiang Mai University Reports Findings in Robotics (Accuracy of implant placemen t with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robotassisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Robotics is the subjec t of a report. According to news reporting out of Chiang Mai, Thailand, by NewsR x editors, research stated, "This systematic review explores the accuracy of com puterized guided implant placement including computer-aided static, dynamic, and robotassisted surgery. An electronic search up to February 28, 2023, was condu cted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the search terms ‘surg ery', ‘computer-assisted', ‘dynamic computer-assisted', ‘robotic surgical proced ures', and ‘dental implants'." Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from Chiang Mai Universi ty, "The outcome variables were discrepancies including the implant's 3D-coronal , -apical and -angular deviations. Articles were selectively retrieved according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data were quantitatively meta- analysed to verify the study outcomes. Sixty-seven articles were finally identif ied and included for analysis. The accuracy comparison revealed an overall mean deviation at the entry point of 1.11 mm (95 % CI: 1.02-1.19), and 1 .40 mm (95% CI: 1.31-1.49) at the apex, and the angulation was 3.5 1 (95% CI: 3.27-3.75). Amongst computerized guided implant placeme nts, the robotic system tended to show the lowest deviation (0.81 mm in coronal deviation, 0.77 mm in apical deviation, and 1.71 in angular deviation). No signi ficant differences were found between the arch type and flap operation in cases of dynamic navigation. The fully-guided protocol demonstrated a significantly hi gher level of accuracy compared to the pilot-guided protocol, but did not show a ny significant difference when compared to the partially guided protocol. The us e of computerized technology clinically affirms that operators can accurately pl ace implants in three directions."
Chiang MaiThailandAsiaClinical Res earchClinical Trials and StudiesComputersEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineMachine LearningRobotRoboticsRobotsSurgery
NETL
NSTL
