首页|University of Los Andes Reports Findings in Cholecystectomy (Feasibility of robo tic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review)
University of Los Andes Reports Findings in Cholecystectomy (Feasibility of robo tic cholecystectomy at an academic center with a young robotic surgery program: a retrospective cohort study with umbrella review)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Surgery - Cholecystect omy is the subject of a report. According to news originating from Bogota, Colom bia, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been standard of care for surgical treatment of benign gallbladder pathol ogy for decades. With the advent of robotic surgical technology, robotic cholecy stectomy (RC) has gained attention as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy." Financial support for this research came from University of the Andes. Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from the University of L os Andes, "This study introduces a single-surgeon experience with laparoscopic v ersus robotic cholecystectomy and an umbrella systematic review of the outcomes of both approaches. A retrospective chart review was performed at a single insti tution on a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing laparoscopi c or robotic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder pathology. An umbrella syste matic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A total of 103 patients wer e identified; 61 patients underwent LC and 42 underwent RC. In the RC cohort, 17 cases were completed using a four-port technique while 25 were completed using a three-port technique. Patients undergoing RC were older compared to the LC gro up (44.78 vs 57.02 years old; p<0.001) and exhibited lower body mass index (29.37 vs 32.37 kg/m, p = 0.040). No statistically significant difference in operative time or need for postoperative ERCP was noted. Neither t his series nor the umbrella systematic review revealed significant differences i n conversion to open surgery or readmissions between the LC and RC cohorts. Thre e-port RC was associated with reduced operative time compared to four-port RC (1 01.28 vs 150.76 min; p<0.001)."
BogotaColombiaSouth AmericaBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCholecystectomyClinical ResearchClinical Trials and StudiesEmerging TechnologiesGas-troenterologyHealth and MedicineLapar oscopic CholecystectomyMachine LearningRoboticsRobotsSurgery
NETL
NSTL
