首页|New Findings from Johns Hopkins University in the Area of Robotics Reported (Aut onomous Spinal Robotic System for Transforaminal Lumbar Epidural Injections:a P roof of Concept of Study)
New Findings from Johns Hopkins University in the Area of Robotics Reported (Aut onomous Spinal Robotic System for Transforaminal Lumbar Epidural Injections:a P roof of Concept of Study)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域,可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Robotics is the subjec t of a report.According to news reporting originating in Baltimore,Maryland,b y NewsRx journalists,research stated,"Phantom study Objective:The aim of our study is to demonstrate in a proof-of-concept model whether the use of a marker less autonomous robotic controlled injection delivery system will increase accur acy in the lumbar spine.Ideal transforaminal epidural injection trajectories (b ilateral L2/3,L3/4,L4/5,L5/SI and SI) were planned out on a virtual pre-opera tive planning software by 1 experienced provider." Funders for this research include National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA,Nat ional Science Foundation (NSF).The news reporters obtained a quote from the research from Johns Hopkins Univers ity,"Twenty transforaminal epidural injections were administered in a lumbar sp ine phantom model,10 using a freehand procedure,and 10 using a marker less aut onomous spinal robotic system.Procedural accuracy,defined as the difference be tween pre-operative planning and actual post-operative needle tip distance (mm) and angular orientation (degrees),were assessed between the freehand and roboti c procedures.Procedural accuracy for robotically placed transforaminal epidural injections was significantly higher with the difference in pre- and post-operat ive needle tip distance being 20.1 (+/- 5.0) mm in the freehand procedure and 1 1.4 (+/- 3.9) mm in the robotically placed procedure (P <.001).Needle tip precision for the freehand technique was 15.6 mm (26.3 - 10.7) compared to 10.1 mm (16.3 - 6.1) for the robotic technique.Differences in needl e angular orientation deviation were 5.6 (+/- 3.3) degrees in the robotically pl aced procedure and 12.0 (+/- 4.8) degrees in the freehand procedure (P = .003)."
BaltimoreMarylandUnited StatesNort h and Central AmericaEmerging TechnologiesMachine LearningRoboticsRobotsJohns Hopkins University