首页|Data on Thrombectomy Reported by Alejandro Tomasello and Colleagues (Modeling Robotic-Assisted Mechanical Thrombectomy Procedures with the CorPath GRX Robot: The Core-Flow Study)
Data on Thrombectomy Reported by Alejandro Tomasello and Colleagues (Modeling Robotic-Assisted Mechanical Thrombectomy Procedures with the CorPath GRX Robot: The Core-Flow Study)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning DailyNews Daily News - New research on Surgery - Thrombectomy is the subject of a report. According to newsreporting out of Barcelona, Spain , by NewsRx editors, research stated, “Endovascular robotic devices mayenable e xperienced neurointerventionalists to remotely perform endovascular thrombectomy . This studyaimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robot-assi sted endovascular thrombectomy comparedwith manual procedures by operators with varying levels of experience, using a 3D printed neurovascularmodel.”Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research, “M1 MCA occlusions were simulated in a3D printed neurovascular model, linked to a CorPath GRX robot in a biplane angiography suite. Fourinterventionalists performed manual endovascu lar thrombectomy ( = 45) and robot-assisted endovascularthrombectomy ( = 37) pr ocedures. The outcomes included first-pass recanalization (TICI 2c-3), thenumbe r and size of generated distal emboli, and procedural length. A total of 82 expe rimental endovascularthrombectomies were conducted. A nonsignificant trend favo ring the robot-assisted endovascularthrombectomy was observed in terms of final recanalization (89.2% versus manual endovascular thrombectomy,71 .1%; = .083). There were no differences in total mean emboli count (16.54 [SD, 15.15] versus15.16 [SD, 16.43]; = .303). However, a higher mean count of emboli o f > 1 mm was observed in therobot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy group (1.08 [SD, 1.00] versu s 0.49 [SD, 0.84]; = .001) comparedwith m anual endovascular thrombectomy. The mean procedural length was longer in robot- assistedendovascular thrombectomy (6.43 [SD, 1.71] minutes versus 3.98 [SD, 1.84] minutes; <.001). Amongestablished neurointerventionalists, previous experience with robo tic procedures did not influence recanalization(95.8% were consid ered experienced; 76.9% were considered novices; = .225). In a 3D printedneurovascular model, robot-assisted endovascular thrombectomy has the po tential to achieve recanalizationrates comparable with those of manual endovasc ular thrombectomy within competitive proceduraltimes.”
BarcelonaSpainEuropeAngiologyEmboliEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineMachine LearningRobotRoboticsRobotsSurgeryThrombectomy
NETL
NSTL
