Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News2024,Issue(Jun.18) :56-57.

University of Porto Reports Findings in Hernias (Robotic surgery versus Laparosc opic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes an d cost systematic literature review and meta-analysis)

波尔图大学报告疝气的发现(机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在抗反流和裂孔疝手术中的比较:短期结果和成本系统文献回顾和荟萃分析)

Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News2024,Issue(Jun.18) :56-57.

University of Porto Reports Findings in Hernias (Robotic surgery versus Laparosc opic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes an d cost systematic literature review and meta-analysis)

波尔图大学报告疝气的发现(机器人手术与腹腔镜手术在抗反流和裂孔疝手术中的比较:短期结果和成本系统文献回顾和荟萃分析)

扫码查看

摘要

一位新闻记者兼机器人与机器学习每日新闻-胃肠病学新研究-的工作人员新闻编辑-她的NIAS是一篇报道的主题。根据NewsRx编辑对Porto的新闻报道,研究称:“本研究的目的是比较机器人外科(RS)和腹腔镜外科(LS)在抗反流和裂孔疝手术中的手术时间、术中并发症、住院时间、再入院率、总体并发症、死亡率和费用。使用MEDLINE(通过PubMed)进行了全面的文献检索。科学网络和Scopus数据库。我们的新闻记者从Porto大学的研究中获得了一句话:“包括比较抗反流和裂孔疝患者RS和LS的短期结果和成本的研究。数据包括手术时间、并发症、住院时间、再入院率、总体并发症、死亡率和死亡率。”Meta分析纳入14项回顾性观察性研究,共涉及555368名参与者,结果显示RS与LS在手术时间、术中并发症、住院时间、再入院率、总体并发症和死亡率等方面均无统计学差异。LS与较低的RS费用相关。这项系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,与LS相比,RS在抗反流和食管裂孔疝手术中具有非劣效性的短期结果。LS更具成本效益,但RS提供了潜在的好处,如改善可视化和增强手术技术。

Abstract

By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Gastroenterology - Her nias is the subject of a report. According to news reporting out of Porto, Portu gal, by NewsRx editors, research stated, "The objective of this study is to comp are the operative time, intraoperative complications, length of stay, readmissio n rates, overall complications, mortality, and cost associated with Robotic Surg ery (RS) and Laparascopic Surgery (LS) in anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases." Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from the University of P orto, "Studies comparing short-term outcomes and cost between RS and LS in patie nts with anti-reflux and hiatal hernia were included. Data on operative time, co mplications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, mortality , and cost were extracted. Quality assessment of the included studies was perfor med using the MINORS scale. Fourteen retrospective observational studies involvi ng a total of 555,368 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The resul ts showed no statistically significant difference in operative time, intraoperat ive complications, length of stay, readmission rates, overall complications, and mortality between RS and LS. However, LS was associated with lower costs compar ed to RS. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that RS has non- inferior short-term outcomes in antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, compared to LS. LS is more cost-effective, but RS offers potential benefits such as impro ved visualization and enhanced surgical techniques."

Key words

Porto/Portugal/Europe/Emerging Techno logies/Gastroenterology/Health and Medicine/Hernias/Hiatal Hernia/Machine L earning/Robotics/Robots/Surgery

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News

Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News

ISSN:
段落导航相关论文