首页|Data on Arthroplasty Reported by Michael Cross and Colleagues [Early Clinical and Economic Outcomes for the VELYS? Robotic- Assisted Solution (V RAS) Compared to Manual Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty]
Data on Arthroplasty Reported by Michael Cross and Colleagues [Early Clinical and Economic Outcomes for the VELYS? Robotic- Assisted Solution (V RAS) Compared to Manual Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty]
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Surgery - Arthroplasty is the subject of a report. According to news reporting out of Indianapolis, Un ited States, by NewsRx editors, research stated, "Robotic-assisted total knee ar throplasty (TKA) has been developed to improve functional outcomes after TKA by increasing surgical precision of bone cuts and soft tissue balancing, thereby re ducing outliers. The DePuy Synthes VELYS? Robotic Assisted Solution (VRAS), is o ne of the latest entrants in the robotic TKA market." Financial support for this research came from DePuy Synthes. Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research, "Currently, there is li mited evidence investigating early patient and economic outcomes associated with the use of VRAS. The Premier Healthcare Database was analyzed to identify patie nts undergoing manual TKA with any implant system compared to a cohort of roboti c-assisted TKAs using VRAS between September 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023. The primary outcome was all cause and knee related all-setting revisits within 90-d ays post TKA. Secondary outcomes included number of inpatient revisits (readmiss ion), operating room time, discharge status, and hospital costs. Baseline covari ate differences between the two cohorts were balanced using fine stratification methodology and analyzed using generalized linear models. The cohorts included 8 66 VRAS and 128,643 manual TKAs that had 90-day follow-up data. The rates of bot h all-cause and knee-related allsetting follow up visits were significantly low er in the VRAS cohort compared to the manual TKA cohort (13.86% vs . 17.19%; Mean Difference (MD): -3.34 [95% CI: -5.65 to -1.03] and 2.66% vs. 4.81% ; MD: -2.15 [-3.23 to -1.08], respectively , p-value <0.01) at 90-day follow-up. The incidence of kne e-related inpatient readmission was also significantly lower (53%) for VRAS compared to manual TKA. There was no significant difference between tot al cost of care at 90-day follow-up between VRAS and manual TKA cases. On averag e, the operating room time was higher for VRAS compared to manual TKA (138 vs. 1 34 minutes). In addition, the discharge status and revision rates were similar b etween the cohorts. The use of VRAS for TKA is associated with lower follow up v isits and knee related readmission rates in the first 90 days postoperative."
IndianapolisUnited StatesNorth and C entral AmericaArthroplastyEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineHospit alsKnee ArthroplastyMachine LearningOrthopedic ProceduresRoboticsRobot sSurgery
NETL
NSTL
