摘要
由一名新闻记者-机器人与机器学习的工作人员新闻编辑每日新闻-关于机器人的新研究是一份报告的主旨。根据NewsR X记者在英国伦敦的新闻报道，研究表明：“触摸为社会情感交流提供了重要的非语言可能性。然而，大多数数字通信缺乏交换情感触觉信息（触觉表情）的能力。”这项研究的财政支持者包括欧洲研究委员会、欧洲地平线研究委员会、伦敦大学学院。新闻记者引用了伦敦大学Colle GE(UCL)的研究，“此外，以前关于触觉表情符号的研究还没有集中在关于人类皮肤中某些机械感受器的情感效应的知识上，例如C-触觉(CT)系统。在这里，我们考察了GE NTLE手动抚摸是否以已知的速度传递，以最佳激活CT系统（定义为‘触觉表情符号’），在实验室模拟的社交媒体交流中，与(1)在CT次优速度下抚摸触摸或(2)标准视觉表情符号相比，参与者(N=36)在CT次优速度下感受到更多的社会支持感和其他亲社会意向。在第二项预先登记的研究(N=52)中，我们调查了视觉表情符号、触觉图标和触觉表情符号是否结合在一起。这种时间由软机器人设备以CT最佳速度传递，可以增强对亲社会意图的感知，并影响参与者的生理测量(例如皮肤电导率)。视觉表情传达的总体社会信息更多，焦虑的参与者对生理测量的影响大于视觉表情。
Abstract
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Robotics is the subjec t of a report. According to news reporting from London, United Kingdom, by NewsR x journalists, research stated, "Touch offers important non-verbal possibilities for socioaffective communication. Yet most digital communications lack capabili ties regarding exchanging affective tactile messages (tactile emoticons)." Financial supporters for this research include European Research Council, HORIZO N EUROPE European Research Council, University College London, University Colleg e London, University College London. The news correspondents obtained a quote from the research from University Colle ge London (UCL), "Additionally, previous studies on tactile emoticons have not c apitalised on knowledge about the affective effects of certain mechanoreceptors in the human skin, e.g., the C-Tactile (CT) system. Here, we examined whether ge ntle manual stroking delivered in velocities known to optimally activate the CT system (defined as ‘tactile emoticons'), during lab-simulated social media commu nications could convey increased feelings of social support and other prosocial intentions compared to (1) either stroking touch at CT sub-optimal velocities, o r (2) standard visual emoticons. Participants (N = 36) felt more social intent w ith CToptimal compared to sub-optimal velocities, or visual emoticons. In a sec ond, preregistered study (N = 52), we investigated whether combining visual emot icons with tactile emoticons, this time delivered at CT-optimal velocities by a soft robotic device, could enhance the perception of prosocial intentions and af fect participants' physiological measures (e.g., skin conductance rate) in compa rison to visual emoticons alone. Visuotactile emoticons conveyed more social int ent overall and in anxious participants affected physiological measures more tha n visual emoticons."
NETL
NSTL