摘要
一位新闻记者-机器人与机器学习的工作人员新闻编辑每日新闻-人工智能的新研究是一篇报道的主题。据来自乌克兰基辅的新闻报道,NewsRx记者称,“这篇论文研究了乌克兰基辅博戈莫尔埃茨国立医科大学的56名医学博士生对科学思维、学术诚信和人工智能使用的态度。2023年,对乌克兰基辅博戈莫尔埃茨国立医科大学的56名医学博士生进行了调查。”我们的新闻记者从博戈莫莱茨国立医科大学的研究中获得一句话:“参与是自愿的,经口头同意。调查问题包括与批判性思维、分析技能、分析能力和其他方面有关的数据。”绝大多数医学博士生(75%)高度重视批判性思维。虽然大多数(89.29%)在英语学习中应用分析和批判性思维技能,但有相当一部分(7.14%)不确定。尽管大多数人意识到作弊和剽窃是不可接受的(75%),一小部分人承认曾发生过剽窃行为(12.5%)。只有30.4%的受访者报告说曾使用GPT聊天进行学习。对目睹同行剽窃或使用人工智能的回应显示出不同的态度,许多人表示不愿意报告此类事件(30.36%)。该调查强调了批判性思维在医学博士生学术学习中的重要性。同时也指出了在这些技能方面的态度和做法可以改进的领域。研究表明,在学术诚信方面有很大的改进余地,因为近三分之一的受访者需要更明确的标准。
Abstract
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Artificial Intelligenc e is the subject of a report. According to news originating from Kyiv, Ukraine, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, "The paper studies the attitude to cr itical thinking, academic integrity and the Artificial Intelligence use of the U krainian medical PhD students. In 2023, 56 medical PhD students from the Bogomol ets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine, underwent the survey." Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from Bogomolets National Medical University, "The participation was voluntary, upon the oral consent. Th e data included in the survey questions include various aspects related to criti cal thinking, analysis skills, and attitudes towards plagiarism. A significant m ajority of the medical PhD students (75%) place high importance on critical thinking. While a majority (89.29%) apply analysis and cri tical thinking skills in their English studies, there's a notable percentage (7. 14%) that is uncertain. Although most are aware of the unacceptabil ity of cheating and plagiarism (75%), a small proportion admit to h aving plagiarized (12.5%). Only 30.4% of the responde nts reported using GPT Chat for study. Responses to witnessing peers plagiarize or using Artificial Intelligence show a varied attitude, with many expressing un willingness to report such incidents (30.36%). The survey highlight s the recognized importance of critical thinking in academic study among medical PhD students, while also points to areas where attitudes and practices regardin g these skills could be improved. The study shows a vast area for improvement re garding academic integrity, as almost one-third of respondents need more defined standards."