摘要
由机器人与机器学习每日新闻的新闻记者兼工作人员新闻编辑-调查人员讨论人工智能的新发现。根据NewsRx Corr Esspondents从斯基德莫尔学院发出的新闻，研究表明："算法技术今天被广泛应用于组织决策，它可以改善资源分配和决策协调，以促进组织内部和组织之间决策过程的准确性和效率。"我们的新闻编辑从斯基德莫尔学院的研究中获得了一句话：“然而，算法控制也引入并放大了组织不平等-女性工人、有色人种和边缘化人口，以及技能低、教育水平低或技术水平低的工人，由于缺乏透明度、可解释性、客观性，可能处于不利地位和受到歧视。”本研究通过系统的文献综述，综合比较了组织中三种不同类型的控制：技术控制、官僚控制和算法控制，从而了解了算法控制的优缺点，并对与算法控制使用有关的组织不等式的文献进行了讨论和总结。我们探讨了值得信赖的算法控制和参与性算法开发的潜力，以减轻与算法控制相关的组织不平等。
Abstract
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News – Investigators discuss new findings in artificial intelligence. According to news originating from Skidmore College by NewsRx corr espondents, research stated, “Algorithmic technologies are widely applied in org anizational decision-making today, which can improve resource allocation and dec ision-making coordination to facilitate the accuracy and efficiency of the decis ion-making process within and across organizations.” Our news editors obtained a quote from the research from Skidmore College: “Howe ver, algorithmic controls also introduce and amplify organizational inequalities -workers who are female, people of color and the marginalized population, and wo rkers with low skills, a low level of education, or who have low technology lite racy can be disadvantaged and discriminated against due to the lack of transpare ncy, explainability, objectivity, and accountability in these algorithms. Throug h a systematic literature review, this study comprehensively compares three diff erent types of controls in organizations: technical controls, bureaucratic contr ols, and algorithmic controls, which led to our understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with algorithmic controls. The literature on the or ganizational inequality related to the employment of algorithmic controls is the n discussed and summarized. Finally, we explore the potential of trustworthy alg orithmic controls and participatory development of algorithms to mitigate organi zational inequalities associated with algorithmic controls.”
NETL
NSTL