首页|LMU University Hospital Reports Findings in Robotics [Biomech anical simulation of segmented intrusion of a mandibular canine using Robot Orth odontic Measurement & Simulation System (ROSS)]
LMU University Hospital Reports Findings in Robotics [Biomech anical simulation of segmented intrusion of a mandibular canine using Robot Orth odontic Measurement & Simulation System (ROSS)]
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News – New research on Robotics is the subjec t of a report. According to news reporting originating in Munich, Germany, by Ne wsRx journalists, research stated, “Aim of this study was to investigate the for ces and moments during segmented intrusion of a mandibular canine using Cantilev er- Intrusion-Springs (CIS). Three different CIS modifications were investigated using a robotic biomechanical simulation system: unmodified CIS (#1 , control), CIS with a lingual directed 6° toe-in bend (#2), and CI S with an additional 20° twist bend (#3).” The news reporters obtained a quote from the research from LMU University Hospit al, “Tooth movement was simulated by the apparative robotic stand, controlled by a force-control algorithm, recording the acting forces and moments with a force -torque sensor. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro- Wilk, Kolmogoro v-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction (a = 0.05). The initial intrusive force, which was uniformly generated by a 35° Ti p-Back bend, decreased significantly (p <0.05) from 0.31 N in group (#1) to 0.28 N in group (#3). Vestibular cro wn tipping reduced significantly (p <0.05) from 2.11° in g roup (#1) and 1.72° in group (#2) to 0.05° in group ( # 3). Matching to that the direction of orovestibular force significantly (p <0.05) shifted from 0.15 N to vestibular in group (#1) to 0.51 N to oral in group (#3) and the orovestibular tipping moment decreased also significantly (p <0.05) from 4.63 Nmm to vestibular i n group (#1) to 3.56 Nmm in group (#2) and reversed to 1.20 Nmm to oral in group (#3). Apart from that the orovestibular displacement changed significantly (p <0.05) from 0.66 mm in buccal direction in group (#1) to 0.29 mm orally in group (# 2) and 1.49 mm in oral direction as well in group (#3). None of the modifications studied achieved pure mandibular canine intrusion without collate ral effects. The significant lingual displacement caused by modification (# 3) is, not least from an aesthetic perspective, considered much more severe than a slight tipping of the canine.”
MunichGermanyEuropeBiomechanical E ngineeringEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineMachine LearningOrthod onticsRobotRoboticsRobots
NETL
NSTL
