首页|Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Reports Findings in Prostatectomy ( Could trainees' finger placement at the surgeon's console affect overAll outcome s of robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy? A prospective, blinded, robotic . ..)
Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Reports Findings in Prostatectomy ( Could trainees' finger placement at the surgeon's console affect overAll outcome s of robotic surgery in radical prostatectomy? A prospective, blinded, robotic . ..)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Surgery - Prostatectom y is the subject of a report. According to news reporting out of Shreveport, Lou isiana, by NewsRx editors, research stated, "Robotic surgery for localized prost ate cancer offers a greater range of motion attributed to the EndoWrist instrume nts. Postoperative outcomes are linked to the quality of vesico-urethral anastom osis." Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research from Louisiana State Uni versity Health Shreveport, "Trainees frequently complain of suturing difficulty in a back-handed fashion. We aimed to analyze wrist motion using the DaVinci sim ulator. We hypothesized that using the thumb and index finger would Allow superi or surgical proficiency when compared to the middle finger. After institutional review board approval, we recruited 42 medical students in one academic medical center. Students were randomly assigned to start with their thumb and index fing er (1&2) or thumb and middle finger (1&3). Three stand ardized modules were used with nine metrics calculated, including: score, total time, economy of motion, efficiency score, collisions, inaccurate puncture, woun d approximation, out of view, and penalty subtotal. Statistical analysis of the metrics was calculated using SPSS. Three metrics were found to have differences between the finger placement of 1&3 compared to 1&2. the number of collisions, wound approximation, and penalty score where 1& 3 were used had a lower score in each. The number of collisions was 5.7 less in the 1&3 finger placement (p=0.046). This metric was found to have s tatisticAlly significant differences between finger placement where 1& 3 had a lower score compared to 1&2. The wound approximation score was 0.2 points lower when using the 1&3 placement (p=0.075). Lastly , the penalty assigned was 6.5 points lower when using 1&3 (p=0.069 ). Although finger placement did not affect the overAll score of the completed s imulation, instrument collisions and unnecessary wound complications may lead to adverse outcomes when using 1&2 despite offering a wider range of motion. This may be due to decreased comfort in hand position."
ShreveportLouisianaUnited StatesNo rth and Central AmericaEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineMachine Lea rningMale Urologic Surgical ProceduresMen's HealthProstatectomyRoboticsRobotsSurgery
NETL
NSTL
