首页|University of Sao Paulo Medical School Reports Findings in Robotics (Robot-assis ted versus laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement: systematic review and meta-a nalysis)
University of Sao Paulo Medical School Reports Findings in Robotics (Robot-assis ted versus laparoscopic ileal ureteral replacement: systematic review and meta-a nalysis)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News – New research on Robotics is the subjec t of a report. According to news reporting originating from Sao Paulo, Brazil, b y NewsRx correspondents, research stated, “Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery ( RALS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (LS) are the main options for ileal ureteral replacement (IUR). It is not clear which option is superior.” Our news editors obtained a quote from the research from the University of Sao P aulo Medical School, “The purpose of this study is to compare RALS and LS for IU R. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and Go ogle Scholar for studies comparing RALS and LS for IUR. The outcomes of interest are operative time, blood loss, postoperative stay, and Clavien-Dindo complicat ions. Meta-analysis was performed with Rev Man version 5.4. We included 36 patie nts from 3 studies. The mean age was 44 years, with 53% male patie nts. Blood loss (MD -89.13 cc, CI -129.03 to -49.22, I = 0%) was si gnificantly lower in patients undergoing RALS when comparing with LS. No differe nces were observed when comparing operative time (MD -10.99 minutes, CI -85.66 t o 63.59, p = 0.77, I = 64%), postoperative stay (MD -2.56 days, CI -8.24 to 3.13, p = 0.38, I = 30%), and postoperative complications (OR 1.63, CI 0.27 to 10.02, p = 0.60, I = 0%).”
Sao PauloBrazilSouth AmericaEmergi ng TechnologiesMachine LearningRobotRobotics
NETL
NSTL
