首页|Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Reports Findings in Prostatectomy (The effect of puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement on climacturia after robot-assi sted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy)
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Reports Findings in Prostatectomy (The effect of puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement on climacturia after robot-assi sted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News – New research on Surgery - Prostatectom y is the subject of a report. According to news reporting originating from Ankar a, Turkey, by NewsRx correspondents, research stated, “Climacturia is defined as urine leakage associated with orgasm and can negatively affect patients’ qualit y of life. The high prevalence of climacturia after radical prostatectomy (RP) h as led to continued efforts to reduce climacturia rates.” Our news editors obtained a quote from the research from Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, “It has been shown that puboperiurethral suspension stitch placemen t during RP assists in the recovery of urinary continence. To evaluate the impac t of puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement during RP on post-RP climactur ia. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent nerve-sparing r obot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) at our institution between 2016 and 2023. T he patients were categorized into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 32) that underwent nerv e-sparing RALP with puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement and Group 2 (n = 62) that underwent nerve-sparing RALP alone. Patients who were not able to ach ieve penetration at the last follow-up visit were excluded from the study. The c linical history, parameters of prostate cancer, details of medical and surgical treatments, and followup data were evaluated. Differences in sexual and urinary function, climacturia rates, and complications between nerve-sparing RP with an d without puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement. There were no significan t differences between the groups in terms of surgical complications. The mean fo llow-up time was 14.62 ? 3.55 months in Group 1 and 14.43 ? 4.44 months in Group 2 (P = .42). Postoperative erectile functions were similar between the groups. At the last follow-up visit, climacturia was present in 4 patients (12.5% ) in Group 1 and 24 patients (38.7%) in Group 2 (P = .016). The lon g-term stress urinary incontinence rates were similar between the groups. This s tudy provides comparative results on postoperative climacturia rates between ner ve-sparing RALP groups with and without puboperiurethral suspension stitch place ment. These results show that puboperiurethral suspension stitch can help to pre vent postoperative climacturia after RP. This is the first study in the literatu re that evaluates the effect of puboperiurethral suspension stitch on climacturi a. The limitations include the single-center, retrospective design with potentia l selection bias, possible inaccuracies in the recorded medical data, and challe nges in controlling confounding variables.”
AnkaraTurkeyEurasiaEmerging Techno logiesHealth and MedicineMachine LearningMale Urologic Surgical ProceduresMen’s HealthProstatectomyRadical ProstatectomyRisk and PreventionRobotRoboticsSurgery
NETL
NSTL
