首页|Data on Arthroplasty Reported by Ishaan Jagota and Colleagues (Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Shorter Navigation Working Time With Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared to Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty)
Data on Arthroplasty Reported by Ishaan Jagota and Colleagues (Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Results in Shorter Navigation Working Time With Similar Clinical Outcomes Compared to Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty)
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
2024 OCT 03 (NewsRx)-By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News-New research on Surgery - Arthroplasty is the subject of a report. According to news reporting out of Sydney, Australi a, by NewsRx editors, research stated, "Early clinical data is important in the appraisal of newly introduced robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) systems in total kn ee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are few studies to date comparing one-year clinical outcomes between RAS and computer-assisted navigation (CAS), the forer unner in reducing alignment outliers." Our news journalists obtained a quote from the research, "The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference between these two groups in early cli nical outcomes, including functional outcome and patient-reported outcome measur es (PROMs). A total of 158 propensity score-matched patients who underwent prima ry TKA with either CAS or RAS were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outco mes (navigation time, length of stay, complications, readmissions, transfusions, and technical failure), as well as functional outcome measures (range of motion , sit to stand test, timed up and go test, single leg stance test, calf raises, and step count), and patient-reported outcome measures (Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, 12-item Short Form Survey, Forgotten Jo int Score-12, and satisfaction) were compared between those who underwent CAS an d those who underwent RAS. Navigation time was shorter in the RAS group compared to the CAS group (mean difference, 15.4 minutes; P<0.001) . There were two complications reported in the CAS group (1 patellar clunk, 1 pe riprosthetic joint infection), but none in the RAS group. There were no other re admissions, transfusions, or technical failures in either group. Postoperatively , there were no clinical differences in function between groups. Clinically mean ingful improvement in PROMs was observed in both groups, with no differences. Th e use of RAS resulted in shorter navigation time compared to CAS in TKA."
SydneyAustraliaAustralia and New Zea landArthroplastyComputersEmerging TechnologiesHealth and MedicineKnee ArthroplastyMachine LearningOrthopedic ProceduresRoboticsRobotsSurgery
NETL
NSTL
