首页|Tax‐loss selling and the January effect revisited: Evidence from municipal bond closed‐end funds and exchange‐traded funds
Tax‐loss selling and the January effect revisited: Evidence from municipal bond closed‐end funds and exchange‐traded funds
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NETL
NSTL
Wiley
We revisit the tax‐loss selling hypothesis as an explanation for the January effect. We expand on prior empirical evidence from municipal bond closed‐end funds (CEFs) by extending the sample period by 19 years and adding exchange‐traded funds (ETFs). Our sample covers the introduction and rapid growth of municipal bond ETFs, significant changes to municipal bond market structure, and the modernization of tax‐loss selling practices. The January effect in municipal bond CEFs has become stronger in recent years and is consistent with the tax‐loss hypothesis. The January effect in municipal bond ETFs is smaller and cannot be explained by tax‐loss selling.
Allen Carrion、Jiang Zhang
展开 >
Department of Finance,Insurance,and Real Estate,University of Memphis,Memphis, Tennessee,USA
Department of Finance,University of St. Thomas,Saint Paul,Minnesota,USA
NETL
NSTL
Wiley
