首页|An assessment of background removal approaches for improved estimation of rice leaf nitrogen concentration with unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral imagery at various observation times
An assessment of background removal approaches for improved estimation of rice leaf nitrogen concentration with unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral imagery at various observation times
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NSTL
Elsevier
? 2022 Elsevier B.V.Background effect is a crucial limitation for the monitoring of leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC) in crops with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral imagery. Some background removal approaches have been developed for improve the estimation of LNC, but their performances are not compared in one study and it is unclear whether they are sensitive to the observation time of UAV imagery. This study evaluated three background removal approaches, i.e., the soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) approach, the green pixel vegetation index approach (GPVI) and abundance adjusted vegetation index (AAVI), for estimating rice LNC from UAV-based multispectral imagery at individual and across growth stages as well as different observation times of the day. The red edge chlorophyll index (CIre) was chosen as the common basis for the last two approaches. In particular, the AAVI approach was refined with a higher number of endmembers and automated endmember extraction, and further evaluated for assessing the effect of separating sunlit components from shaded components of the canopy. Our results demonstrated that the vegetation indices (VIs) for off-noon observation times showed better relationships with LNC than those for noon at individual and across growth stages. Compared to both SAVI and CIre-green, the AACIre for all pixels (AACIre-all) exhibited the weakest sensitivity to observation time and yielded the best relationships for single-stage (jointing: r2=0.70, booting: r2=0.76, heading: r2=0.70) and across-stage (r2=0.66) models. Among the AAVIs derived from three categories of pixels, the AACIre-sunlit (R2 =0.90, RMSE=0.17%, Bias=0.03%) outperformed AACIre-all (R2 =0.85, RMSE=0.23%, Bias=0.08%) and then AACIre-shaded (R2 =0.38, RMSE=0.49%, Bias=0.40%) remarkably for the estimation accuracy of LNC. This study suggests that the refined AAVI approach has great value in reducing the background effect for more accurate monitoring of growth parameters and could be extended to other crops and regions for improved precision crop management and field-based high-throughput phenotyping.
National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture (NETCIA) MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture Nanjin
NSTL
Elsevier
