首页|Estimating nitrogen risk to Himalayan forests using thresholds for lichen bioindicators

Estimating nitrogen risk to Himalayan forests using thresholds for lichen bioindicators

扫码查看
? 2021 The AuthorsHimalayan forests are biodiverse and support the cultural and economic livelihoods of their human communities. They are bounded to the south by the Indo-Gangetic Plain, which has among the highest concentrations of atmospheric ammonia globally. This source of excess nitrogen pushes northwards into the Himalaya, generating concern that Himalayan forests will be impacted. To estimate the extent to which atmospheric nitrogen is impacting Himalayan forests we focussed on lichen epiphytes, which are a well-established bioindicator for atmospheric nitrogen pollution. First, we reviewed published literature describing nitrogen thresholds (critical levels and loads) at which lichen epiphytes are affected, identifying a mean and confidence intervals based on previous research conducted across a diverse set of biogeographic and ecological settings. Second, we used estimates from previously published atmospheric chemistry models (EMEP-WRF and UKCA-CLASSIC) projected to the Himalaya with contrasting spatial resolution and timescales to characterise model variability. Comparing the lichen epiphyte critical levels and loads with the atmospheric chemistry model projections, we created preliminary estimates of the extent to which Himalayan forests are impacted by excess nitrogen; this equated to c. 80–85% and c. 95–98% with respect to ammonia and total nitrogen deposition, respectively. Recognising that lichens are one of the most sensitive bioindicators for atmospheric nitrogen pollution, our new synthesis of previous studies on this topic generated concern that most Himalayan forests are at risk from excess nitrogen. This is a desk-based study that now requires verification through biological surveillance, for which we provide key recommendations.

AmmoniaCritical levelCritical loadHimalayan forestsLichenNitrogen pollution

Sharma S.、Ellis C.J.、Steadman C.E.、Reay D.、Vieno M.、Jones M.R.、Sutton M.、Chatterjee S.、Negi S.、Pandey B.P.、Rai H.、Tshering D.、Weerakoon G.、Wolseley P.

展开 >

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering Kathmandu University

Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh

School of Geosciences University of Edinburgh

Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Bush Estate

TERI School of Advanced Studies

Uttaranchal Youth and Rural Development Centre

Department of Chemical Science and Engineering Kathmandu University

Centre of Advanced Study in Botany Banaras Hindu University

Sherubtse College Royal University of Bhutan

Natural History Museum

展开 >

2022

Biological Conservation

Biological Conservation

SCI
ISSN:0006-3207
年,卷(期):2022.265
  • 4
  • 99