首页|Dissolution Rate of Nanomaterials Determined by Ions and Particle Size under Lysosomal Conditions: Contributions to Standardization of Simulant Fluids and Analytical Methods
Dissolution Rate of Nanomaterials Determined by Ions and Particle Size under Lysosomal Conditions: Contributions to Standardization of Simulant Fluids and Analytical Methods
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
NSTL
Amer Chemical Soc
Dissolution of inhaled engineered nanomaterials (ENM) under physiological conditions is essential to predict the clearance of the ENM from the lungs and to assess their biodurability and the potential effects of released ions. Alveolar macrophage (AM) lysosomes contain a pH 4.5 saline brine with enzymes and other components. Different types of artificial phagolysosomal simulant fluids (PSFs) have been developed for dissolution testing, but the consequence of using different media is not known. In this study, we tested to which extent six fundamentally different PSFs affected the ENM dissolution kinetics and particle size as determined by a validated transmission simulant media were consistent with each other and with in vivo clearance. These media predict the quick dissolution of ZnO, the partial dissolution of SiO2, and the very slow dissolution of TiO2. The valid media use either a mix of organic acids (with the total concentration below 0.5 g/L, thereof citric acid below 0.15 g/L) or another organic acid (KH phthalate). For several ENM, including ZnO, BaSO4, and CeO2, all these differences induce only minor modulation of the dissolution rates. Only for TiO2 and SiO2, the interaction with specific organic acids is highly sensitive, probably due to sequestration of the ions, and can lead to wrong predictions when compared to the in vivo behavior. The media that fail on TiO2 and SiO2 dissolution use citric acid at concentrations above 5 g/L (up to 28 g/L). In the present selection of ENM, fluids, and methods, the different lysosomal simulant fluids did not induce changes of particle morphology, except for small changes in SiO2 and BaSO4 particles most likely due to ion dissolution, reprecipitation, and coalescence between neighboring particles. Based on the current evidence, the particle size by TEM analysis is not a sufficiently sensitive analytical method to deduce the rate of ENM dissolution in physiological media. In summary, we recommend the standardization of ENM dissolution testing by one of the three valid lysosomal simulant fluids with determination of the dissolution rate and halftime by the quantification of ions. This recommendation was established for a continuous flow system but may be relevant as well for static (batch) solubility testing.
NSTL
Amer Chemical Soc
