The Journal of surgical research.2022，Vol.27312.DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.012

Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Civilian Thoracic Trauma in the Field and Emergency Department Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu, Amy Nguyen, Jackie Ehrlich, Haley Bisbee, Charles Santiesteban, Luis Santos, Radleigh McKenney, Mark Elkbuli, Adel
The Journal of surgical research.2022，Vol.27312.DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.012
✕
  • NSTL
  • Elsevier

Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Civilian Thoracic Trauma in the Field and Emergency Department Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liu, Amy 1Nguyen, Jackie 1Ehrlich, Haley 1Bisbee, Charles 1Santiesteban, Luis 1Santos, Radleigh 2McKenney, Mark 1Elkbuli, Adel1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Dept Surg,Kendall Reg Med Ctr
  • 2. Dept Math,Nova Southeastern Univ
  • 折叠

Abstract

Background: Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy (ED-RT) or prehospital resuscitative thoracotomy (PH-RT) is performed for trauma patients with impending or full cardiovascular collapse. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyze outcomes in patients with thoracic trauma receiving PH-RT and ED-RT. Methods: PubMed, JAMA Network, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched to identify studies published on ED-RT or PH-RT between 2000-2020. Patients were grouped by location of procedure and type of thoracic injury (blunt versus penetrating). Results: A total of 49 studies met the criteria for qualitative analysis, and 43 for quantitative analysis. 43 studies evaluated ED-RT and 5 evaluated PH-RT. Time from arrival on scene to PH-RT > 5 min was associated with increased neurological complications and time from the initial encounter to PH-RT or ED-RT > 10 min was associated with increased mortality. ISS > 25 and absent signs of life were also associated with increased mortality. There was higher mortality in all PH-RT (93.5%) versus all ED-RT (81.8%) ( P = 0.02). Among ED-RTs, a significant difference was found in mortality rate between patients with blunt (92.8%) versus penetrating (78.7%) injuries ( P < 0.001). When considering only blunt or penetrating injury types, no significant difference in RT mortality rate was found between ED-RT and PH-RT ( P = 0.65 and P = 0.95, respectively). Conclusions: ED-RT and PH-RT are potentially life-saving procedures for patients with penetrating thoracic injuries in extremis and with signs of life. The efficacy of this procedure is time sensitive. Moreover, there appears to be a greater mortality risk for patients with thoracic trauma receiving RT in the PH setting compared to the ED setting. More studies are needed to determine the significance of PH-RT mortality. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Key words

ED thoracotomy/Prehospital thoracotomy/Field resuscitation/Trauma outcomes/Thoracic blunt and penetrating trauma/PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE/PENETRATING CARDIAC INJURIES/EASTERN ASSOCIATION/URGENT THORACOTOMY/MORTALITY/WOUNDS/BLUNT/PREDICTORS/SURVIVAL/OUTCOMES

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2022
The Journal of surgical research.

The Journal of surgical research.

ISSN：0022-4804
被引量4
参考文献量76
段落导航相关论文