Precambrian Research2022,Vol.36820.DOI:10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106467

Reconstruction of Rodinia supercontinent: Evidence from the Erguna Block (NE China) and adjacent units in the eastern Central Asian orogenic Belt

Feng, Zhiqiang Zhang, Qianhan Liu, Yongjiang Li, Long Jiang, Liwei Zhou, Jianping Li, Weimin Ma, Yongfei
Precambrian Research2022,Vol.36820.DOI:10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106467

Reconstruction of Rodinia supercontinent: Evidence from the Erguna Block (NE China) and adjacent units in the eastern Central Asian orogenic Belt

Feng, Zhiqiang 1Zhang, Qianhan 1Liu, Yongjiang 2Li, Long 3Jiang, Liwei 2Zhou, Jianping 2Li, Weimin 4Ma, Yongfei5
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Taiyuan Univ Technol
  • 2. Ocean Univ China
  • 3. Univ Alberta
  • 4. Jilin Univ
  • 5. Shenyang Ctr China Geol Survey
  • 折叠

Abstract

The Central Asian Orogenic Belt is sandwiched between the Siberian, East European (Baltica), Tarim, and North China cratons, which contain several Precambrian micro-continental blocks, such as the Kazakhstan-Yili-Central Tianshan blocks, the Junggar Block and the Amuria Block. The tectonic nature and positions of these micro continental blocks are unclear and disputed in many supercontinent reconstructions. In particular, the position of the Amuria Block in the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt, which is important for the reconstructions of the Precambrian Rodinia supercontinent, remains unknown because of the lack of late Palaeoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic geological and geochronological data. The Erguna Block, a part of the Amuria Block in NE China, has been considered as a constituent block of the Rodinia supercontinent. However, the late Palaeoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the Erguna Block with respect to the assembly and break-up of Rodinia remains poorly understood. Here we present zircon U-Pb-Hf-O isotopic data and whole-rock elemental data of the newly discovered late Palaeoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic records in the northern Erguna Block. The gneissic granites have protolith and metamorphic ages of 1839 & PLUSMN; 24 and 497 & PLUSMN; 6 Ma, respectively, and relatively uniform two-stage Hf model ages (TDM1) of 2.67-1.26 Ga, indicating that the Erguna Block has a Palaeoproterozoic crystalline basement. The zircon U-Pb ages for the Neoproterozoic intrusive rocks define two stages of magmatism in early Neoproterozoic (Stage 1; i.e., ca. 946 Ma) and middle Neoproterozoic (Stage 2; i.e., 833-737 Ma), respectively, implying that the Erguna Block had switched to an intra-continental extensional setting (833-737 Ma) after the early Neoproterozoic (ca. 946 Ma) convergence-accretion. A comparison of data from the Erguna Block and its adjacent units reveals that the Erguna and Central Mongolia blocks were likely in a single crustal entity with the Tarim Craton associated with the Rodinia assembly at ca. 900 Ma. This composite block then detached from the Tarim Craton at ca. 800 Ma following the break-up of Rodinia, and drifted southwards to the vicinity of the Siberia Craton during the Cambrian.

Key words

Zircon geochronology/Hf and O isotopes/Erguna block/Late Palaeoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic/magmatism/Rodinia/U-PB AGES/GREAT XINGAN RANGE/LA-ICP-MS/ZIRCON U/INNER-MONGOLIA/TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS/VOLCANIC-ROCKS/NEOPROTEROZOIC MAGMATISM/CONTINENTAL GROWTH/METAMORPHIC ROCKS

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2022
Precambrian Research

Precambrian Research

SCI
ISSN:0301-9268
被引量6
参考文献量111
段落导航相关论文